Save Mumbai Mangroves campaign: Who really benefits from the coastal road?

Mangroves are being cut in Mumbai even as the world observes Environment Day. Watch this video to understand citizens' concerns regarding the Coastal Road project.

“We are literally risking our lives with floods. We are a coastal city. To mess around with mangroves is digging your own grave,” says Pooja Domadia of Save Mumbai Mangroves, a campaign born in the wake of the decision to construct the Versova-Bhayandar Coastal Road in Mumbai. This mega project is going to impact 45,000 mangroves.

The cutting of the mangroves has already begun to make way for the 26.3 km Coastal Road. In March this year, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the Bombay High Court’s go-ahead for the project. But concerned Mumbaikars are not giving up. Save Mumbai Mangroves has been speaking up, creating awareness through various means, and staging protests for the past few months.

Fisherfolk at Cahrkop Gaon
Fisherman Dhiraj Bhandari shows the point where the tunnel for the coastal road is likely to come and the creek where they fish. The fishing community at Charkop too is worried about the coastal road and its effect on their livelihood. Pic: Shruti Gokarn

“We want to understand a little more about how the afforestation practices are being done,” says Vidushi Kala of the group. The expectations of the group from the BMC are simple: be transparent in your decisions and involve the public in the decision-making process. After all, it is a public project, made with public resources and made for the public.

Check out this video interview, where Pooja and Vidushi tell Citizen Matters about their concerns regarding the coastal road, alternatives to it, their expectations from the BMC, and what keeps them going:

Also read:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The ecological burden: Bidadi township debate highlights growing threat to wildlife movement

The proposed GBIT project could affect elephant habitats between Bengaluru and Ramanagara, worsening human–wildlife conflict.

The proposed GBIT project has generated considerable debate regarding its potential ecological impacts on the Bengaluru–Ramanagara landscape. Two overarching concerns include the loss of highly productive agricultural land, and the transformation of the region's existing natural ecosystems. In particular, the large-scale loss of tree cover and waterbodies has attracted significant public attention. However, another key ecological dimension is wildlife habitats and animal mobility. Unlike agricultural fields or trees, wildlife movement is dynamic and spans diverse landscapes. The area between Bengaluru and Ramanagara is marked by recurring human–wildlife conflicts, particularly human–elephant. Understanding these elephant movements is crucial  for addressing broader ecological…

Similar Story

Protect wetlands and prevent flooding: Citizen’s Charter for Pallikaranai Watershed

Through the report, the Pallikaranai Collective demands urgent action to stop encroachment and concretisation in Chennai's wetlands.

The Citizen’s Charter for the Pallikaranai Watershed has called for watershed-based planning and immediate implementation of state policies to protect wetlands and waterways in one of Chennai's most flood-prone areas. The charter, compiled by the Oorvani Foundation and the Chennai Wetlands Action Collective (CWAC), was released on Wednesday by the Pallikaranai Collective, a coalition of civil society organisations, environmental groups, resident welfare associations, activists and conservation experts striving to protect the Pallikaranai watershed region. The report documents issues ranging from wetland degradation, encroachment by construction projects, sewage and solid waste pollution and blocked canals to poorly planned restoration works and…