Living near the coast? What you must know about Coastal Regulation Zone guidelines

CRZ rules are meant to guide coastal development and protect marine ecosystems. This video explains what activities are allowed along the coast.

Waking up to the sound of waves crashing against the shore and enjoying a panoramic view of the sea from your high-rise balcony. It’s the kind of lifestyle promoted by real estate brochures, luring home buyers with properties steps away from the beach. But what about the impact of indiscriminate development along the coastline?

Coastal areas are delicate ecosystems that bear the brunt of unchecked urban expansion. This development often comes at the cost of mangroves, sand dunes and delicate marine habitats. Recognising this looming threat, the Government of India introduced the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) guidelines. These are specifically important for big, coastal cities like Mumbai and Chennai.

The CRZ notification is a set of rules meant to protect coastal ecosystems. According to the annual report for 2023-24 released by the Union Ministry of Home Affairs, the length of India’s coastline is 11,098.8 km. Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the first CRZ notification was issued in 1991 to regulate the activities in and around the coast of India. The notification has undergone several amendments since then.


Read more: Explainer: Why is the Coastal Regulation Zone so important for Mumbai’s well-being?


The Coastal Regulation Zone is divided further into four zones. Certain activities are allowed along the coast, depending upon the zone within which a property or piece of land falls. This video explainer elaborates on the four zones and describes how people living along the coast can check if their property falls into one of these zones.

Also read:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Open letter to Chief Justice of India: Withdraw unjust remarks made against environmental groups

In the letter, conservationists, lawyers and civil society groups highlighted the constitutional right of citizens to demand the enforcement of environmental laws.

A collective of citizens, environmentalists, legal experts and civil society organisations from across India has demanded that the Supreme Court withdraw oral remarks made by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) during the Pipavav Port hearing on May 11, 2026. The group aims to ensure these comments are not misinterpreted as questioning the legitimacy of genuine environmental public-interest litigation, or the constitutional right of citizens and affected communities to demand the enforcement of environmental laws. In an open letter to the CJI, the coalition outlined urgent environmental concerns and the right of citizens to question irregularities in projects negatively impacting…

Similar Story

The trees we forget: What a city loses when the canopy disappears

Bengaluru's trees are more than shade; they are memory, identity, and resistance. Their loss leaves the city harsher and emptier.

Summer in India has been merciless this year, with many states recording temperatures above 42 degrees Celsius and rising reports of fatalities. Despite these harsh conditions, urban support continues for development projects that clear trees, wetlands, mangroves, and forests near cities. A recent Article 14 report provides data on thousands of trees that will soon be sacrificed nationally for infrastructure projects. Those opposing such unscientific large-scale tree felling are often labelled 'tree-huggers', 'anti-development' and 'anti-nationals'. While capitalism accelerates environmental degradation and the world faces a growing climate crisis, societal divisions deepen.  Yet, we give trees too little credit: Beings necessary…