No scientific or ecological basis for reducing lake buffer zones: Conservationist Ram Prasad

In a video interview, the co-founder of Friends of Lakes warns that shrinking buffer zones could unleash unchecked construction, threatening Bengaluru’s lake ecosystems.

In September 2025, the Karnataka government issued a notification modifying the buffer zones around Bengaluru’s stormwater drains and lakes. The new guidelines prescribe just 15 metres for primary drains, 10 metres for secondary, and only 5 metres for tertiary drains—much lower than the earlier mandates of 30/15/10 metres.

The notification follows the proposal to amend the Karnataka Tank Conservation and Development Authority (KTCDA) Act, reducing buffer zones around lakes. Lake buffers, which were at 30 metres, have been proposed to be reduced to a range between 0 and 30 metres, based on the lake’s size.

This move has been criticised by civic activists and disaster management experts, who warn that shrinking buffer zones will accelerate flooding, tree loss, and the deterioration of lakes and smaller tanks. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) had earlier directed larger protective zones.

The issue has now reached a flashpoint, with the Karnataka Governor recently returning the KTCDA (Amendment Bill), 2025, seeking clarifications from the government on lake buffer zone reductions. Meanwhile, concerns remain that reduced buffers could give developers more room to build at the edges of drains and tanks, weakening both the health of water systems and the safety of communities living around them.


Read more: Why Bengaluru must preserve and restore its lakes


The notification to modify the drain buffer zones is open for public consultation. Citizens can send their objections or suggestions to the Urban Development Department by September 30, 2025.

In this interview, Ram Prasad, Co-founder of Friends of Lakes, explains what these changes mean for Bengaluru’s environment, flood resilience, and the future of its lakes and tanks.

Citizens can send objections/suggestions to:

Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Urban Development Department,
Vikasa Soudha, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi,
Bengaluru – 560001

Also read:

Comments:

  1. Ramesh says:

    Buffer Zones of 30-15-10 should be maintained along primary,secondary & tertiary drains with tree coverage to keep the lakes intact

  2. Useful post, keep sharing more like this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pallikaranai Marsh’s Zone of Influence: Threat or shield for South Chennai?

Pallikaranai Marsh acts as a buffer against Chennai floods. Protecting homes and ecology around it needs a proper ZoI, not weak rules.

Every monsoon, South Chennai goes underwater. The only sponge that soaks up all that rain is the Pallikaranai Marsh, yet around it, 8,619 hectares of land face severe flood risks. Despite this, the State has offered to protect only a fraction of that land.  On October 9th, the Tamil Nadu State Wetlands Authority (TNSWA) told the Madras High Court  that the marsh's interim Zone of Influence (ZoI) is just 36 survey numbers, covering 128.19 hectares. The next hearing of the case is on November 11th.  Scattered "protection"  These plots lie in bits and pieces across seven villages, from Pallikaranai to Perumbakkam.…

Similar Story

Blocked Kovalam-Nemmeli wetland channels risk disaster for South Chennai; Conservationists urge action  

Barriers built for the Mamallan Reservoir block Buckingham Canal water flow, vital to keep the wetland alive, avoid floods and sustain fishing families.

In Chengalpattu district, the main water channels of the Kovalam-Nemmeli coastal wetland, which drains a catchment of more than 270 square kilometres, have currently been blocked. Barriers that obstruct water flow have been built across Chennai's Buckingham Canal at three places: Thiruvidanthai-Vadanemmeli, near the Nemmeli-Thiruporur bridge, and Saluvankuppam. Earlier, we explored how the Mamallan Reservoir causes serious damage to the wetland’s ecology and how fishing livelihoods are affected. Field investigations by the Wetland Conservation Network have recorded the blockages preventing tidal exchange in the Buckingham Canal.           According to officials, these barriers were put up to enable construction of the Mamallan…