Information for voters in Saidapet constituency

Saidapet voters, here is all you need to know about your constituency and candidates contesting in the Assembly elections.

Saidapet, one of Chennai’s most historic and politically significant constituencies, enters the 2026 elections with a mix of legacy importance and persistent civic frustration. Once represented by leaders like M Karunanidhi, the constituency today reflects the pressures of dense urban living—ranging from river-adjacent flooding risks to infrastructure strain.

Saidapet Assembly Constituency is part of the Chennai South parliamentary seat. It includes key areas such as Guindy, Kotturpuram, Nandanam, and Jafferkhanpet.


Map showing the Saidapet Assembly constituency. Pic courtesy: OpenCity.in.

Political Representation

Saidapet is a general constituency.

Candidates for 2026 polls

After the SIR, Saidapet has over 2 lakh voters. Around 15 candidates are contesting for Saidapet, with Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam,  Naam Tamilar Katchi and Amma Makkal Munnettra Kazagam in the fray.  The current Health Minister Ma Subramanian, who has held the constituency since 2016, is hoping to make a comeback. If voted back, he said he will focus on healthcare and resettlement. NTK is fielding candidate Srividya G. 

Meanwhile, the Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) is fielding M Arul Prakasam who said, if elected, he would focus on issuance of land titles, and creating a drug-free Saidapet. A campaign-related law and order incident was reported where the candidate’s convoy was attacked.

Top candidates

2026CandidateSexPartyAgeLink to Affidavit 
1SUBRAMANIAN MAMaleDMK66Download Here
2ARUL PRAKASAM MMaleTVK44Download Here
3SRIVIDYA GFemaleNTK46Download Here

All candidate details can be found on the portal of the ECI here.

2021 polling snapshot

  • Total number of voters: 2,69,884
  • Male voters: 1,32,819
  • Female voters:1,37,065
  • Others: –
  • Polling percentage:1,59,169 (59.4%) 

Source: Election Commission of India

Previous results: 2021

2021CandidateSexPartyAgeVotes polled (Share of vote %)
1MA SubramaniamMaleDMK6180194(50.02%)
2Saidai DuraisamyMaleAIADMK6950786(31.68%)
3SnehapriyaFemaleMNM2913454 (8.39%)

Source: Election Commission of India

Previous results: 2016

2016CandidateSexPartyAgeVotes polled (Share of vote %)
1Ma SubramaniamMaleDMK5679279(48.2%)
2C PonnayianMaleAIADMK7463024(38.3%)
3V KalidasMaleBJP516000(3.7%)

Source: ECI/myNeta

Incumbent MLA: Ma Subramanian

Ma. Subramanian is a senior DMK leader and the current Minister for Health and Family Welfare of Tamil Nadu (since May 2021). A seasoned politician, he previously served as the 47th Mayor of Chennai (2006–2011) and is a two-term MLA representing the Saidapet constituency. He joined the DMK in 1976 and also serves as the party’s Youth Wing Deputy General Secretary.

MLA profile

Age: 66 years 

Educational qualification: Holds a BA degree from University of Madras and LLB from Bangalore University.

Contact details:

  • Phone – 7550299999 / 9176700000
  • Email – masubramaniandmkcs@gmail.com

Criminal records:

  • charges related to Forgery for purpose of cheating (IPC Section-468)
  • charges related to Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property (IPC Section-420)
  • charges related to Punishment of criminal conspiracy (IPC Section-120B)\

Social media presence: 

Source: myNeta

MLA in the media

Ma Subramanian highlighted key development works executed in the constituency, including the installation of high-mast lights under the Tamil Nadu Urban Development Fund, and the construction of a new Chennai Primary School building on Bazaar Road.

He also pointed to welfare initiatives such as a Rs 40 lakh workers’ rest facility in Ward 142 and distribution of 216 ryotwari pattas to residents across 21 streets under the Gramanatham category.Infrastructure upgrades, including additional classroom blocks and improved lighting, were also cited. Subramanian further referred to the ongoing 3.2 km elevated corridor project from Saidapet to Teynampet, being executed.

Key citizen demands

Chronic flooding, ageing drainage systems, and relentless traffic congestion continue to disrupt daily life, especially in internal pockets.  Voters in Saidapet have expressed dissatisfaction over the rising availability of ganja among youngsters, irregular functioning of Tasmac outlets, and persistent civic issues such as poor drainage, traffic congestion and inadequate public amenities, even as several infrastructure projects progress in the constituency. 

The residents living along the Adyar river and canal complained of an increasing mosquito menace due to untreated sewage inflow. Citizens seek relief from unregulated parking and street hawkers causing traffic congestion. 

Also Read

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Check how your MPs have performed in Parliament (and here’s why)

From 100% attendance to only 26%, how did your MP perform this Budget Session? See who is truly representing your voice in our MP Tracker.

When Ranjan Gogoi, the former Chief Justice of India, retired from the Rajya Sabha two months ago, his performance in Parliament became a matter of debate. As per an analysis by Livelaw, Gogoi did not ask a question to the government even once during the six years of his tenure and participated in the debate on only one Bill.  More recently, when seven AAP MPs defected to BJP, another analysis by Indian Express revealed that one of these seven defecting MPs, Harbhajan Singh, a former cricketer, had only 26% attendance.  Why do we typically go around digging data on the…

Similar Story

Deepening reservoirs, rainwater harvesting: Sustainable alternatives to the Mamallan dam

Why Mamallan reservoir? Experts say Chennai's water future lies in greener solutions — desilting old reservoirs and maintaining neglected tanks.

Ever since the contentious Mamallan reservoir was proposed in the ecosensitive Kovalam–Nemmeli backwater system, fisher communities in Chennai have repeatedly asked: Does it have to be here? Experts and scientists say no, urging the government to abandon the project and work on sustainable alternatives.  Critics point to a long list of costs: high expenditure, land acquisition, and risks to livelihoods and biodiversity. As we have reported earlier, the central concern driving the project is the looming drinking water supply crisis – demand is projected to rise from 1,100 million litres a day (MLD) to over 2,500 MLD for the Greater…