Villivakkam: Residents tired of the perennial woe of inundation

To view map, see: http://bl.ocks.org/d/e2e6aeaae37a9ed7e58a2f13c995a700

Villivakkam, once the largest Assembly Constituency in Chennai, now has over 2.52 lakh voters from Viduthalai Guruswamy Nagar (South) , Ayanavaram, Nagammaiyar Nagar (South), Panneerselvam Nagar, Villivakkam (North) and Villivakkam (South) . After the delimitation in 2008, Kolathur, Madhavaram, Ambattur, Maduravoyal, and Virugambakkam were carved out from it, while parts of Purasawalkam were added to make the constituency in its present form. Before delimitation, the constituency has seen DMK, AIADMK, CPI (M), TMC(M), and INC in power.

Candidates

  • Raju  (AIADMK)
  • Ranganathan (DMK)
  • Subramanian (PMK)
  • Jaishankar (BJP)
  • Palanivel (BSP)
  • Pandiyan (DMDK) 
  • K.M. Sucharitha (YSP)
  • Vagai Venthan (NTK)
  • Jagadesh (Valamaana Tamizhagam Katchi)

Independent candidates

  • B.Mohamed Iqbal Basha
  • M.Gunasekaran
  • R.K.Ravichandran
  • S.Kandasamy
  • S.RANJITHKUMAR
  • C.Pandiyan
  • D.Elavarasan
  • G.Ashok Kumar

Know your candidates

Ranganathan (DMK)

DMK’s candidate B. Ranganathan was the MLA of Vilivakkam during 2006-11 . He had defeated G. Kalan of AIADMK by a margin of 30,116 votes. DMK is campaigning hard to win this constituency back. He was accused of  involvement in a murder case by the victim’s family.

Rasu (AIADMK)

AIADMK’s sitting MLA J.C. Prabhakar is contesting against M.K. Stalin in Kolathur constituency which was carved out of Villivakkam. The party has fielded the councillor of Ward 98 M. Rasu popularly known as ‘Thadi Rasu’.

Key issues

A significant section of the voters in this constituency are employees of  industrial estates in and around the area, and the coach factory in Perambur. Speeches and hand-outs in Telugu points to the candidates’ attempt to woo the Telugu-speaking  population here.

Like the nearby Perambur constituency, the residents of Villivakkam  battle with the problem of flooding during monsoons  and sewage overflow. “The sewage pipes are clogged and  the existing drain water storms are not maintained properly. Every time they clean the drains and heap the silt and garbage on the banks. The next rain carries it all back to the drains. This exercise is pointless,” explains Vijaya Kumar, an auto-driver from SIDCO Nagar.

The residents demand removal of encroachments and reclamation of Villivakkam lake which is covered with water hyacinth. SIDCO Nagar, which now has around 13,000 houses,  was  built on Villivakkam lake, and it was no surprise that it was one of the worst affected areas during the December floods. Floods being an important political plank this elections, the candidates have promised to build more storm water drains and sewerages. Encroachments and illegal buildings even in areas like the High Court Colony are other factors that stifle the waterways.

Power supply is another issue raised by the residents of SIDCO Nagar. “There are a lot of industries in and around the area, and this puts pressure on the available resources. We are told that having a three-phase connection would improve power supply. But , we cannot afford it,” says Mr. Kumar

Difficulty in accessing government services and corruption are among the issues that leave the residents infuriated. “ If we approach government offices, we end up spending  days or even months to get things sorted. But, if we pay middle men; for instance, driving schools in the case of getting licenses, things will be done in no time. This system is convenient for the rich,” says Manikandan from Villivakkam.

Like many other constituencies, drinking water supply, and lack of access to Public Distribution System are everyday concerns for many residents. Though a few infrastructure developments like vehicular subways and bus terminus were undertaken recently, the residents  said that a lot more needs to be done to improve  transport and sanitation facilities.

Voting history

Year Winner Party
1977 K. Suppu Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
1980 J. C. D. Prabhakar Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
1984 V. P. Chinthan Communist Party of India (Marxist)
1989 W. R. Varadarajan Communist Party of India (Marxist)
1991 E. Kalan Indian National Congress
1996 J. M. Haroon Rasheed Tamil Maanila Congress (Moopanar)
2001 D. Napoleon Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
2006 B. Ranganathan Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
2011 J. C. D. Prabhakar Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Left off the list: How SIR is costing transgender voters their rights

Mismatched documents, hostile families, and no dedicated support leave many trans citizens at risk of being removed from electoral rolls.

For Rayyan Monkey, a transgender voter from Mumbai, the SIR does not just threaten her right to vote. It also risks her ability to travel freely and exist as a woman in the country. Raised abroad before moving to Mumbai, Rayyan was left unmapped on the voter lists because her parents did not vote in 2002. The only way for her to complete her progeny mapping is to provide either her grandfather’s Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) card or her father’s birth certificate. However, after coming out to her family, Rayyan has been estranged from her extended relatives. Her father’s documents,…

Similar Story

Karnataka Apartment Management Bill: The proposed law needs one critical correction

A flaw in the Karnataka Apartment Bill, 2026 could derail apartment governance in Bengaluru and beyond. Why the 50% allotment rule must be amended.

The proposed Karnataka Apartment Management Bill, 2026 is an important step towards simplifying apartment governance in the state. By replacing the overlapping provisions of the Karnataka Ownership Flats Act (KOFA) and the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act (KAOA) with a single legislation, the government has an opportunity to create a more transparent and efficient legal framework for apartment communities. Many of the proposed provisions are likely to benefit homebuyers, apartment associations and developers alike, by reducing legal ambiguity and providing a common framework for the management of residential communities. However, one provision deserves urgent reconsideration before the Bill becomes law. Formation…