Should ‘Action Taken’ reports on government audits be made mandatory?

This webinar will provide insights into the role of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), India's statutory watchdog agency.

An informed citizenry is the hallmark of a mature democracy. Hence, institutions or mechanisms that empower citizens, by providing feedback on the working of government, are essential pillars of democracy.

Citizen Matters has published a series of explainers by experts from the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), India’s statutory watchdog agency. It is responsible for the performance audit of government functions/departments.

CAG reports have covered a wide range of subjects: health, education, road safety, toll, guidance value of property, mining, construction workers’ welfare, etc. The articles focus on the performance of overall state finances with respect to State PSUs, Departments, Autonomous Bodies, etc. The receipt of grants from the Government has also been detailed.


Read more: BBMP pours 90 lakhs down the incomplete drain


All these reports have been tabled in the assembly and are in the public domain.

  • Which are the reports that are relevant to us, as active citizens of Bengaluru?
  • What can we learn from these reports?
  • What happens to CAG’s recommendations and how to track what happens on the ground through action taken reports?

To discuss this, Citizen Matters, Bengaluru chapter, is organising a webinar, titled ‘How to make governments accountable?’, on September 27th, Tuesday, at 5.30 pm. The webinar will be followed by a brief Q&A session open to participants.

How to make governments accountable Citizen Matters Webinar poster
How to make governments accountable? A panel discussion. Pic: Citizen Matters

Read more: Bengaluru lacks buffer zones, raja kaluves, data and will to protect lakes: CAG


Event details

Event Title: How to make governments accountable

Date: September 27, 2022, Tuesday

Time: 5:30 pm

Register here: https://bit.ly/CMwebinarregister

(The webinar will be followed by a brief Q&A session open to participants.)

Speakers:

  • E P Nivedita – Nivedita is a civil servant in the Indian Audit and Accounts Service (IAAS) – Batch of 1993
  • Himanshu Upadhyaya – Assistant Professor at Azim Premji University
  • Anjali Saini – Member of Whitefield Rising
  • T R Gopalakrishnan – Consulting Editor, Citizen Matters – moderator

Also read

Comments:

  1. G R Gururaj says:

    Though rains & Storm Water Drain annual feature has become common and SWD impact has been brought out neatly by CAG in its Annual Report and has created havoc to general public.. the subject matter drains as the time passes

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Chennai to lose thrice as many trees as originally estimated for Metro Phase II

Over 8,000 trees would be either felled or transplanted for the project. Meanwhile, over a third of the transplanted trees haven't survived.

‘Inconvenience today for a better tomorrow’ signs follow commuters across the city as work inches on for the 118-km Chennai Metro Phase II. Residents eagerly await three corridors that will connect Madhavaram to SIPCOT, Lighthouse to Poonamalle Bypass, and Madhavaram to Sholinganallur by 2028. But the project is resulting in an irreversible loss of green cover along the corridors, far more than was estimated at the time of its approval. A total of 8,029 trees would be affected, either felled or transplanted, for the project. Over 7,000 of these trees have been uprooted already. Though new trees are planted to…

Similar Story

A decade without a Master Plan: Who should be planning Bengaluru’s future?

Bengaluru’s future must focus on breaking free from outdated frameworks and embracing citizen-led, climate-resilient planning.

Nearly a decade ago, while I was working on the Revised Master Plan for Bengaluru (RMP 2031), a senior planner remarked: “Only the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) has the legal right to plan for Bengaluru.” Today, that assertion is unravelling in a tussle between the newly formed Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) and the BDA over who should plan for the city’s future. What is more troubling is that Bengaluru’s current master plan, the RMP 2015, is based on surveys from 2003, nearly two decades out of date. The Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act (KTCPA) of 1961 requires revision every…