Ward information page: Ward 54 – Hudi

What were the works done in Hudi ward in the last five years? How much money was spent on it? What are the issues troubling the residents?

54 – Hudi

 

Like all other wards in the city, this ward too suffers from road problems despite the BBMP spending heaviy on it. There is an active citizen community trying to change the way things are, however tangible results are yet to be seen. The ward has an odd structure, with four disjoint areas of land formig one ward, making the administration and cordination among agencies difficult and causing confusion among voters. More information on the ward:

MLA (2013): Arvind Limbavali (BJP), Mahadevapura
MP (2014): P C Mohan (BJP), Bangalore Central

BBMP 2010

Corporator: B A Basavaraju (INC)
#331, Srirama Nilaya, Byrathi, Doddagubbi Post, Bangalore-49. Ph: 9844029229
Reservation: BC-A

Votes
Winner’s percentage: 41.5
Winner’s margin: 7151
Total votes polled: 16470
Total voters: 28149

BBMP 2015

Total voters: 42842
Male: 24088
Female: 8730
Others: 24

Reserved: SC

Contesting Candidates

BJP: HV Manjunath
INC: Hariprasad AC
JDS: M Venkatesh
Independent: 
Belathur Venkatesh
Bharatiya Praja Paksha: S M Krishna

Demographics

  • Population (2011): 50191
  • Households: 12579
  • Area: 15 sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

  • Road length: 759 km
  • Lakes: Sadara mangala, Hoodi Kere -2, Jimkenahalli, Total area: 29.6 sq km
  • Parks: 7, Total area: 2.1 sq km
  • Playgrounds: 0, Total area: 0 sq km

Active citizen groups/RWAs

  • Whitefield Rising
  • Bruhat Whitefield Residential Communities Association
  • Hoodi Rising

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

 

More information on candidates

No candidates have filled the information collection form so far. If you know anyone contesting, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud


Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It is not from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Related Articles

Ward information page: Ward 149 – Varthur
All you need to know about Ward 84 – Hagadur
All you need to know about Ward 85 – Doddanekkundi
Ward information page: Ward 83 – Kadugodi
Ward information: 82 – Garudacharpalya

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…