Ward information page: Ward 54 – Hudi

by August 19, 2015 Governance
What were the works done in Hudi ward in the last five years? How much money was spent on it? What are the issues troubling the residents?

54 – Hudi

 

Like all other wards in the city, this ward too suffers from road problems despite the BBMP spending heaviy on it. There is an active citizen community trying to change the way things are, however tangible results are yet to be seen. The ward has an odd structure, with four disjoint areas of land formig one ward, making the administration and cordination among agencies difficult and causing confusion among voters. More information on the ward:

MLA (2013): Arvind Limbavali (BJP), Mahadevapura
MP (2014): P C Mohan (BJP), Bangalore Central

BBMP 2010

Corporator: B A Basavaraju (INC)
#331, Srirama Nilaya, Byrathi, Doddagubbi Post, Bangalore-49. Ph: 9844029229
Reservation: BC-A

Votes
Winner’s percentage: 41.5
Winner’s margin: 7151
Total votes polled: 16470
Total voters: 28149

BBMP 2015

Total voters: 42842
Male: 24088
Female: 8730
Others: 24

Reserved: SC

Contesting Candidates

BJP: HV Manjunath
INC: Hariprasad AC
JDS: M Venkatesh
Independent: Belathur Venkatesh
Bharatiya Praja Paksha: S M Krishna

Demographics

  • Population (2011): 50191
  • Households: 12579
  • Area: 15 sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

  • Road length: 759 km
  • Lakes: Sadara mangala, Hoodi Kere -2, Jimkenahalli, Total area: 29.6 sq km
  • Parks: 7, Total area: 2.1 sq km
  • Playgrounds: 0, Total area: 0 sq km

Active citizen groups/RWAs

  • Whitefield Rising
  • Bruhat Whitefield Residential Communities Association
  • Hoodi Rising

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

 

More information on candidates

No candidates have filled the information collection form so far. If you know anyone contesting, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud


Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It is not from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Related Articles

Ward information page: Ward 149 – Varthur
All you need to know about Ward 84 – Hagadur
All you need to know about Ward 85 – Doddanekkundi
Ward information page: Ward 83 – Kadugodi
Ward information: 82 – Garudacharpalya

Sections:

About Poll Desk

Read more by Poll Desk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

by September 12, 2026 Governance
Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Continue reading

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

by August 26, 2026 Governance
The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Continue reading