Tough cop Rajvir P Sharma transferred

The fate of 132 cases against BBMP engineers is in question with the transfer of BMTF head Rajvir P Sharma. BBMP has decided to transfer the cases against the engineers, related to the building violations, to the concerned police stations.

Rajvir P Sharma, the man who dared to take action against BBMP engineers for their inaction against building violations, has been transferred out of Bangalore Metropolitan Task Force (BMTF). J D Madhuchandra Tejaswi, Under Secretary to government, DPAR (Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms) services, sent the transfer order to Sharma.

ADGP Rajvir Sharma. Pic: Sankar C G

According to the order, Dr P Ravindranath will assume charge as Inspector General of Police (IGP), BMTF, with immediate effect.  Ravindranath is an IPS officer of the 1989 batch of the Karnataka Cadre. He had been serving as IGP, Excise Enforcement.

ADGP Rajvir P Sharma, an IPS officer, had taken charge of BMTF nine months ago. But he soon became a headache for BBMP as he started taking action against BBMP engineers. Frustrated, BBMP Employees and Officers association had protested for three days last week. They demanded Sharma’s transfer, withdrawal of cases against the engineers, and also expected BMTF function under BBMP Commissioner.

BBMP Officers and Officials Association president S Subramanyam says BMTF cannot take action against BBMP employees without the prior permission from the Commissioner, adding “BBMP works in accordance with Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act. It is in the same way BMTF should works under Commissioner.”

When Citizen Matters contacted Reju M T, Deputy Secretary of DPAR , he said, “We have sent the transfer order to Sharma as per Chief Minister’s order. I don’t know anything more; for further information, you have to contact Chief Minister’s office.”

With Sharma’s transfer, the fate of 132 cases registered against BBMP engineers is in question. When Citizen Matters asked Sharma about this, he said, “I have to obey the government order. You better ask this question to the new officer or to the government.” Mayor D Venkatesh Murthy says, “We will transfer the cases to the concerned police stations for further investigation.”

The BMTF was formed in 1996 under the state government’s Urban Development Department (UDD) to detect and investigate offences related to illegal encroachment of government property within Bangalore Metropolitan Area. It is supposed to work as a watchdog for protection of government land. It has a police wing (prosecution), town planning wing (for inspections) and an administration wing. BMTF does not have power to take action against builders but can take action against concerned BBMP engineers.

B Radha, Deputy Director of Town Planning,  who worked with Sharma in BMTF, is sad about the transfer order. She says, “BMTF became very active after he took charge. He has guided us in the right direction and we will follow the same path.”

Comments:

  1. Sankar C G says:

    Rajvir P Sharma approached Central Administrative tribunal and obtained a stay order on the transfer for two weeks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…