What is the growth in assets of re-contesting candidates from Bengaluru?

by April 9, 2014 Governance
Curious to know how much would be the asset growth of the candidates who are re-contesting? Here's some data for you!

Here goes the list of growth of Assets of candidates for Bangalore Urban constituencies, who have contested earlier.  The list is a mere compilation from their affidavits.

Ananthkumar

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

 Liability (Rs)

 Total Asset (Rs)

2009

99,82,432

68,85,163

0

1,68,67,595

2014

1,23,59,969

3,60,41,192

28,83,233

4,84,01,161

 

 

P C Mohan

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2009 (LS Election)

3,83,88,000

1,84,41,000

3,28,87,000

5,37,29.000

2013 (Assembly Election)

18,15,81,650

12,31,02,400

17,69,36,948

30,46,84,050

2014 (LS Election)

26,45,16,699

21,12,79,600

26,11,11,284

47,57,96,299

 

C  Narayanaswamy

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2008 (Assembly Election)

1,00,000

2,10,00,000

NIL

2,11,00,000

2014 (L S Election)

34,52,597

24,45,00,000

9,22,460

24,79,52,597

 

D V Sadananda Gowda

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2009 (LS Election)

48,43,959

1,12,28,000

24,86,447

1,60,71,959

2012 (MLC)

86,39,382

4,83,09,977

1,45,70,119

5,69,49,359

2014 (LS Election)

4,73,91,874

5,14,97,000

3,70,20,152

9,88,88,874

 

 

Abdul Azeem

Year

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

Income (Rs)

2013

88,75,125

7,25,00,000

NIL

8,10,30,126

4,26,107

(2012-13)

2014

1,08,09,759

14,81,00,000

NIL

15,89,09,759

4,18,170

(2013-14)
Sections:

About Arpana H S

Read more by Arpana H S

Comments:

  1. Ravindra Karki says:
    April 11, 2014 at 8:25 am

    Unimaginable Immovable asset growth for Sadanand Gowda in just two years ?? 86 lakhs to 4.73 crores ?? We can also give money to him so that he can also grow it 5 times in 2 years ??

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

by March 30, 2026 Governance
As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Continue reading

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

by , and March 19, 2026 Governance
Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…

Continue reading