What is the growth in assets of re-contesting candidates from Bengaluru?

by April 9, 2014 Governance
Curious to know how much would be the asset growth of the candidates who are re-contesting? Here's some data for you!

Here goes the list of growth of Assets of candidates for Bangalore Urban constituencies, who have contested earlier.  The list is a mere compilation from their affidavits.

Ananthkumar

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

 Liability (Rs)

 Total Asset (Rs)

2009

99,82,432

68,85,163

0

1,68,67,595

2014

1,23,59,969

3,60,41,192

28,83,233

4,84,01,161

 

 

P C Mohan

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2009 (LS Election)

3,83,88,000

1,84,41,000

3,28,87,000

5,37,29.000

2013 (Assembly Election)

18,15,81,650

12,31,02,400

17,69,36,948

30,46,84,050

2014 (LS Election)

26,45,16,699

21,12,79,600

26,11,11,284

47,57,96,299

 

C  Narayanaswamy

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2008 (Assembly Election)

1,00,000

2,10,00,000

NIL

2,11,00,000

2014 (L S Election)

34,52,597

24,45,00,000

9,22,460

24,79,52,597

 

D V Sadananda Gowda

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2009 (LS Election)

48,43,959

1,12,28,000

24,86,447

1,60,71,959

2012 (MLC)

86,39,382

4,83,09,977

1,45,70,119

5,69,49,359

2014 (LS Election)

4,73,91,874

5,14,97,000

3,70,20,152

9,88,88,874

 

 

Abdul Azeem

Year

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

Income (Rs)

2013

88,75,125

7,25,00,000

NIL

8,10,30,126

4,26,107

(2012-13)

2014

1,08,09,759

14,81,00,000

NIL

15,89,09,759

4,18,170

(2013-14)
Sections:

About Arpana H S

Read more by Arpana H S

Comments:

  1. Ravindra Karki says:
    April 11, 2014 at 8:25 am

    Unimaginable Immovable asset growth for Sadanand Gowda in just two years ?? 86 lakhs to 4.73 crores ?? We can also give money to him so that he can also grow it 5 times in 2 years ??

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

by November 6, 2026 Governance
While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Continue reading

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

by November 2, 2026 Governance
With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…

Continue reading