What is the growth in assets of re-contesting candidates from Bengaluru?

Curious to know how much would be the asset growth of the candidates who are re-contesting? Here's some data for you!

Here goes the list of growth of Assets of candidates for Bangalore Urban constituencies, who have contested earlier.  The list is a mere compilation from their affidavits.

Ananthkumar

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

 Liability (Rs)

 Total Asset (Rs)

2009

99,82,432

68,85,163

0

1,68,67,595

2014

1,23,59,969

3,60,41,192

28,83,233

4,84,01,161

 

 

P C Mohan

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2009 (LS Election)

3,83,88,000

1,84,41,000

3,28,87,000

5,37,29.000

2013 (Assembly Election)

18,15,81,650

12,31,02,400

17,69,36,948

30,46,84,050

2014 (LS Election)

26,45,16,699

21,12,79,600

26,11,11,284

47,57,96,299

 

C  Narayanaswamy

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2008 (Assembly Election)

1,00,000

2,10,00,000

NIL

2,11,00,000

2014 (L S Election)

34,52,597

24,45,00,000

9,22,460

24,79,52,597

 

D V Sadananda Gowda

 

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

2009 (LS Election)

48,43,959

1,12,28,000

24,86,447

1,60,71,959

2012 (MLC)

86,39,382

4,83,09,977

1,45,70,119

5,69,49,359

2014 (LS Election)

4,73,91,874

5,14,97,000

3,70,20,152

9,88,88,874

 

 

Abdul Azeem

Year

Movable Asset (Rs)

Immovable Asset (Rs)

Liability (Rs)

Total Asset (Rs)

Income (Rs)

2013

88,75,125

7,25,00,000

NIL

8,10,30,126

4,26,107

(2012-13)

2014

1,08,09,759

14,81,00,000

NIL

15,89,09,759

4,18,170

(2013-14)

Comments:

  1. Ravindra Karki says:

    Unimaginable Immovable asset growth for Sadanand Gowda in just two years ?? 86 lakhs to 4.73 crores ?? We can also give money to him so that he can also grow it 5 times in 2 years ??

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Chennai to lose thrice as many trees as originally estimated for Metro Phase II

Over 8,000 trees would be either felled or transplanted for the project. Meanwhile, over a third of the transplanted trees haven't survived.

‘Inconvenience today for a better tomorrow’ signs follow commuters across the city as work inches on for the 118-km Chennai Metro Phase II. Residents eagerly await three corridors that will connect Madhavaram to SIPCOT, Lighthouse to Poonamalle Bypass, and Madhavaram to Sholinganallur by 2028. But the project is resulting in an irreversible loss of green cover along the corridors, far more than was estimated at the time of its approval. A total of 8,029 trees would be affected, either felled or transplanted, for the project. Over 7,000 of these trees have been uprooted already. Though new trees are planted to…

Similar Story

A decade without a Master Plan: Who should be planning Bengaluru’s future?

Bengaluru’s future must focus on breaking free from outdated frameworks and embracing citizen-led, climate-resilient planning.

Nearly a decade ago, while I was working on the Revised Master Plan for Bengaluru (RMP 2031), a senior planner remarked: “Only the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA) has the legal right to plan for Bengaluru.” Today, that assertion is unravelling in a tussle between the newly formed Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) and the BDA over who should plan for the city’s future. What is more troubling is that Bengaluru’s current master plan, the RMP 2015, is based on surveys from 2003, nearly two decades out of date. The Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act (KTCPA) of 1961 requires revision every…