Info for voters of Chickpet constituency – MLA, Candidates, Voting and more

by May 9, 2018 Governance

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of Chickpet, this is what you need to know!

List of candidates, 2018:

Uday B. Garudachar

Party: Bharatiya Janata Party
  • Family: Wife & 3 Dependents
  • Educational Qualification: B.E.
  • Profession: Business
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self- 1.67 cr, Spouse- 58.42 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 105 cr, Spouse- 29 cr
    • Immovable Assets: 58.79 cr, Spouse- 2.10 cr
    • Liabilities: Self- 56.64 cr, Spouse- 2.63 cr

RV Devaraj

Party: Indian National Congress
  • Family: Wife & 3 Dependents
  • Educational Qualification: B.A.
  • Profession: Business
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth (2018)
    • IT Returns: Self- 88.70 lakhs, Spouse- 30.95 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 13.90 cr, Spouse- 6.06 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self- 54.22 cr, Spouse- 7.08 cr
    • Liabilities: Self- 1.02 cr, Spouse- 15.53 lakhs

Dr. D. Hemachandra Sagar

Party: Janata Dal ( Secular)

  • Family: Wife
  • Educational Qualification: M.B.B.S.
  • Profession: Doctor
  • Online: No details given
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth (2018)
    • IT Returns: Self- 3.87 cr, Spouse- 93.94 lakhs, HUF- 16.42 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 19 cr, Spouse- 16.97 cr, HUF- 14.53 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self- 43.32 cr, Spouse- 10 cr, HUF- 86.77 cr
    • Liabilities- NIL

Full List of Candidates:

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-169.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results:

2013 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

R V Devaraj

INC

44714

55

41.09%

Uday B Garudachar

BJP

31655

53

29.09%

M C Narayana Gowda

JD(S)

24328

61

22.41%

Mujahid Pasha A

SDPI

4821

31

4.43%

Khamar Taj

KJP

953

38

0.88%

 

2008 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share%

Dr. Hemachandra Sagar

BJP

40252

53

40.23%

R V Devaraj

INC

32971

50

32.95%

B Z Muzammil Ahmed Khan

JD(S)

23662

33

23.65%

Narendra Kumar Jain

RAHS

640

43

0.64%

Ananth L R

BSP

619

56

0.62%

 

Citizen Demands:

About the Constituency:

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-169-1.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px” ]

Sections:

About Poll Desk

Read more by Poll Desk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

by November 5, 2024 Governance
While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Continue reading

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

by November 1, 2024 Governance
The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…

Continue reading