Info for voters of Chickpet constituency – MLA, Candidates, Voting and more

by May 9, 2018 Governance

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of Chickpet, this is what you need to know!

List of candidates, 2018:

Uday B. Garudachar

Party: Bharatiya Janata Party
  • Family: Wife & 3 Dependents
  • Educational Qualification: B.E.
  • Profession: Business
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self- 1.67 cr, Spouse- 58.42 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 105 cr, Spouse- 29 cr
    • Immovable Assets: 58.79 cr, Spouse- 2.10 cr
    • Liabilities: Self- 56.64 cr, Spouse- 2.63 cr

RV Devaraj

Party: Indian National Congress
  • Family: Wife & 3 Dependents
  • Educational Qualification: B.A.
  • Profession: Business
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth (2018)
    • IT Returns: Self- 88.70 lakhs, Spouse- 30.95 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 13.90 cr, Spouse- 6.06 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self- 54.22 cr, Spouse- 7.08 cr
    • Liabilities: Self- 1.02 cr, Spouse- 15.53 lakhs

Dr. D. Hemachandra Sagar

Party: Janata Dal ( Secular)

  • Family: Wife
  • Educational Qualification: M.B.B.S.
  • Profession: Doctor
  • Online: No details given
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth (2018)
    • IT Returns: Self- 3.87 cr, Spouse- 93.94 lakhs, HUF- 16.42 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 19 cr, Spouse- 16.97 cr, HUF- 14.53 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self- 43.32 cr, Spouse- 10 cr, HUF- 86.77 cr
    • Liabilities- NIL

Full List of Candidates:

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-169.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results:

2013 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

R V Devaraj

INC

44714

55

41.09%

Uday B Garudachar

BJP

31655

53

29.09%

M C Narayana Gowda

JD(S)

24328

61

22.41%

Mujahid Pasha A

SDPI

4821

31

4.43%

Khamar Taj

KJP

953

38

0.88%

 

2008 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share%

Dr. Hemachandra Sagar

BJP

40252

53

40.23%

R V Devaraj

INC

32971

50

32.95%

B Z Muzammil Ahmed Khan

JD(S)

23662

33

23.65%

Narendra Kumar Jain

RAHS

640

43

0.64%

Ananth L R

BSP

619

56

0.62%

 

Citizen Demands:

About the Constituency:

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-169-1.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px” ]

Sections:

About Poll Desk

Read more by Poll Desk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

by July 25, 2024 Governance
The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Continue reading

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

by July 23, 2024 Governance
The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…

Continue reading