Info for voters of Chickpet constituency – MLA, Candidates, Voting and more

by May 9, 2018 Governance

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of Chickpet, this is what you need to know!

List of candidates, 2018:

Uday B. Garudachar

Party: Bharatiya Janata Party
  • Family: Wife & 3 Dependents
  • Educational Qualification: B.E.
  • Profession: Business
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self- 1.67 cr, Spouse- 58.42 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 105 cr, Spouse- 29 cr
    • Immovable Assets: 58.79 cr, Spouse- 2.10 cr
    • Liabilities: Self- 56.64 cr, Spouse- 2.63 cr

RV Devaraj

Party: Indian National Congress
  • Family: Wife & 3 Dependents
  • Educational Qualification: B.A.
  • Profession: Business
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth (2018)
    • IT Returns: Self- 88.70 lakhs, Spouse- 30.95 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 13.90 cr, Spouse- 6.06 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self- 54.22 cr, Spouse- 7.08 cr
    • Liabilities: Self- 1.02 cr, Spouse- 15.53 lakhs

Dr. D. Hemachandra Sagar

Party: Janata Dal ( Secular)

  • Family: Wife
  • Educational Qualification: M.B.B.S.
  • Profession: Doctor
  • Online: No details given
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: NIL
  • Net Worth (2018)
    • IT Returns: Self- 3.87 cr, Spouse- 93.94 lakhs, HUF- 16.42 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self- 19 cr, Spouse- 16.97 cr, HUF- 14.53 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self- 43.32 cr, Spouse- 10 cr, HUF- 86.77 cr
    • Liabilities- NIL

Full List of Candidates:

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-169.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results:

2013 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

R V Devaraj

INC

44714

55

41.09%

Uday B Garudachar

BJP

31655

53

29.09%

M C Narayana Gowda

JD(S)

24328

61

22.41%

Mujahid Pasha A

SDPI

4821

31

4.43%

Khamar Taj

KJP

953

38

0.88%

 

2008 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share%

Dr. Hemachandra Sagar

BJP

40252

53

40.23%

R V Devaraj

INC

32971

50

32.95%

B Z Muzammil Ahmed Khan

JD(S)

23662

33

23.65%

Narendra Kumar Jain

RAHS

640

43

0.64%

Ananth L R

BSP

619

56

0.62%

 

Citizen Demands:

About the Constituency:

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-169-1.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px” ]

Sections:

About Poll Desk

Read more by Poll Desk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Left off the list: How SIR is costing transgender voters their rights

by July 31, 2026 Governance
Mismatched documents, hostile families, and no dedicated support leave many trans citizens at risk of being removed from electoral rolls.

For Rayyan Monkey, a transgender voter from Mumbai, the SIR does not just threaten her right to vote. It also risks her ability to travel freely and exist as a woman in the country. Raised abroad before moving to Mumbai, Rayyan was left unmapped on the voter lists because her parents did not vote in 2002. The only way for her to complete her progeny mapping is to provide either her grandfather’s Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) card or her father’s birth certificate. However, after coming out to her family, Rayyan has been estranged from her extended relatives. Her father’s documents,…

Continue reading

Similar Story

Karnataka Apartment Management Bill: The proposed law needs one critical correction

by July 30, 2026 Governance
A flaw in the Karnataka Apartment Bill, 2026 could derail apartment governance in Bengaluru and beyond. Why the 50% allotment rule must be amended.

The proposed Karnataka Apartment Management Bill, 2026 is an important step towards simplifying apartment governance in the state. By replacing the overlapping provisions of the Karnataka Ownership Flats Act (KOFA) and the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act (KAOA) with a single legislation, the government has an opportunity to create a more transparent and efficient legal framework for apartment communities. Many of the proposed provisions are likely to benefit homebuyers, apartment associations and developers alike, by reducing legal ambiguity and providing a common framework for the management of residential communities. However, one provision deserves urgent reconsideration before the Bill becomes law. Formation…

Continue reading