Ward information – Ward 89: Jogupalya ward

What are the complaints that voters in Jogupalya have? How much money was spent in the ward? What were the works done?

89 – Jogupalya

 

The number of voters in this ward has considerably come down since last BBMP elections. Garbage, street light and drainage seem to be the problems bothering the residents. More information follows:

MLA (2013): N A Haris (INC), Shanthi Nagar
MP (2014): P C Mohan (BJP), Bangalore Central

BBMP 2010

Corporator: M. Gowtham Kumar (BJP)
#354/5, 3rd Cross, Someshwarapura, Cambridge Layout, Halsoor, Bangalore. Ph: 9845035510
Reservation: G

Votes
Winner’s percentage: 21.8
Winner’s margin: 2795
Total votes polled: 12335
Total voters: 27240

BBMP 2015

Total voters: 26082
Male: 13166
Female: 12911
Others: 5

Reserved: General

Contesting Candidates

BJP: Gautham Kumar
INC: P Chandrashekhar
JDS: Ruben Moses
Independent: MR Gaoutham, S Chandrashekhar, M Mani

Demographics

  • Population (2011): 33793
  • Households: 8806
  • Area: 0.9 sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

  • Road length: 436 km
  • Lakes: , Total area: 0 sq km
  • Parks: 3, Total area: 0.5 sq km
  • Playgrounds: 4, Total area: 2.7 sq km

Active citizen groups/RWAs

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

 Candidates

No candidates have filled the information collection form so far. If you know anyone contesting, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud:

 

Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It is not from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Related Articles

All you need to know about Ward 79 – Sarvagna Nagar
All you need to know about Ward 55 – Devasandra
Ward information page: Ward 149 – Varthur
Ward information page: Ward 54 – Hudi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Public gatherings in Tamil Nadu: SOPs must be followed in full spirit for safety

New SOPs in Tamil Nadu mandate safety measures at mass events, placing responsibility on organisers to protect participants.

In a country like ours, where mass gatherings of various kinds are an integral part of life, we keep hearing of stampedes invariably leading to casualties, every now and then. Last year saw two such events, which made national headlines and shook the nation, one a sports victory parade gone sour in Bengaluru and the other, a stampede at a political road show in Karur, Tamil Nadu. The year before, Chennai witnessed huge crowds at an IAF show on the Marina Beach, which led to five deaths and more than a hundred hospitalisations due to heat-related issues and chaos arising…

Similar Story

The good news: Bengaluru’s unified transport vision. The bad: BMLTA rules auto-approve Tunnel Road

The proposed rules for the Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority let major projects like the Tunnel Road through without a formal review.

The Karnataka government has notified the draft Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority (BMLTA) rules — over three years after the BMLTA Act came into being — and has invited suggestions/objections by February 2nd, 2026.   The BMLTA was meant to be a unified transport body to regulate, monitor, develop and plan urban mobility in Bengaluru. The government had failed to constitute the Authority within the statutory timeline of six months. Now, the much-delayed draft rules propose to strip away all forms of transparency and accountability! One controversial clause (Rule 24) proposes to grant deemed approval to projects initiated between 2022…