All you need to know about Ward 79 – Sarvagna Nagar

What were the works done in Sarvagna Nagar ward in the last five years? How much money was spent on it? What are the issues troubling the residents?

79 – Sarvagna Nagar

Some of the job codes for this ward have no description of the work to be done. This means the contractor gets paid without anyone having a chance to even know what he did, in the future, forget checking the quality of the work done. Here is more information on Sarvagnanagar ward.

MLA (2013): S Raghu (BJP), C.V. Ramannagar (SC)
MP (2014): P C Mohan (BJP), Bangalore Central

BBMP 2010:

Corporator: G. Bhuvaneshwari (BJP), Reservation:SC
#3208, 6th main road, 13th cross, H.A.L, Indiranagar, Bangalore-38. Ph:9945630799

Votes:
Winner’s percentage: 19
Winner’s margin:619
Total votes for the winner: 13349
Total voters: 33389

BBMP 2015:

Total voters: 32874
Male: 17434
Female: 15420
Others: 20

Reserved: OBC-A (Women)

Contesting Candidates:

BJP: Shashirekha Mukund
INC: Manjula
JDS: Swapna

Demographics

Population (2011): 37291
Voters: 31741
Households: 9052
Area: 3.6sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

Road length: 231 km
Lakes: Kadirena Palya (Binnamangala), Total area:5.9 sq km
Parks: 7, Total area:4 sq km
Playground: 1, Total area:0.1 sq km

Active Citizen groups/RWAs

 

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

Candidates

These are the candidates contesting the BBMP elections- 2015, whose information is available with Citizen Matters. If you do not find a particular candidate on this page, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud:

Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It is not from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Comments:

  1. Afsar says:

    Good Morning

    Over all Sarvagna Nagar is in bad shape – no sweepers, no supervisor, no marshals. It goes on for weeks even months before any isuue is noticed or corrected.

    At this rate be sure Sarvagna Nagar ward no. 79 will become a slum.

    Please arrange a walk thru all areas and arrange a thorough cleaning.

    We need action Mr. MLA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Check how your MPs have performed in Parliament (and here’s why)

From 100% attendance to only 26%, how did your MP perform this Budget Session? See who is truly representing your voice in our MP Tracker.

When Ranjan Gogoi, the former Chief Justice of India, retired from the Rajya Sabha two months ago, his performance in Parliament became a matter of debate. As per an analysis by Livelaw, Gogoi did not ask a question to the government even once during the six years of his tenure and participated in the debate on only one Bill.  More recently, when seven AAP MPs defected to BJP, another analysis by Indian Express revealed that one of these seven defecting MPs, Harbhajan Singh, a former cricketer, had only 26% attendance.  Why do we typically go around digging data on the…

Similar Story

Deepening reservoirs, rainwater harvesting: Sustainable alternatives to the Mamallan dam

Why Mamallan reservoir? Experts say Chennai's water future lies in greener solutions — desilting old reservoirs and maintaining neglected tanks.

Ever since the contentious Mamallan reservoir was proposed in the ecosensitive Kovalam–Nemmeli backwater system, fisher communities in Chennai have repeatedly asked: Does it have to be here? Experts and scientists say no, urging the government to abandon the project and work on sustainable alternatives.  Critics point to a long list of costs: high expenditure, land acquisition, and risks to livelihoods and biodiversity. As we have reported earlier, the central concern driving the project is the looming drinking water supply crisis – demand is projected to rise from 1,100 million litres a day (MLD) to over 2,500 MLD for the Greater…