All you need to know about Ward 79 – Sarvagna Nagar

What were the works done in Sarvagna Nagar ward in the last five years? How much money was spent on it? What are the issues troubling the residents?

79 – Sarvagna Nagar

Some of the job codes for this ward have no description of the work to be done. This means the contractor gets paid without anyone having a chance to even know what he did, in the future, forget checking the quality of the work done. Here is more information on Sarvagnanagar ward.

MLA (2013): S Raghu (BJP), C.V. Ramannagar (SC)
MP (2014): P C Mohan (BJP), Bangalore Central

BBMP 2010:

Corporator: G. Bhuvaneshwari (BJP), Reservation:SC
#3208, 6th main road, 13th cross, H.A.L, Indiranagar, Bangalore-38. Ph:9945630799

Votes:
Winner’s percentage: 19
Winner’s margin:619
Total votes for the winner: 13349
Total voters: 33389

BBMP 2015:

Total voters: 32874
Male: 17434
Female: 15420
Others: 20

Reserved: OBC-A (Women)

Contesting Candidates:

BJP: Shashirekha Mukund
INC: Manjula
JDS: Swapna

Demographics

Population (2011): 37291
Voters: 31741
Households: 9052
Area: 3.6sq km

Civic Amenities/Infrastructure

Road length: 231 km
Lakes: Kadirena Palya (Binnamangala), Total area:5.9 sq km
Parks: 7, Total area:4 sq km
Playground: 1, Total area:0.1 sq km

Active Citizen groups/RWAs

 

If you represent any RWA from this area, please click here and fill your info. It will be added to this space after verification.

Candidates

These are the candidates contesting the BBMP elections- 2015, whose information is available with Citizen Matters. If you do not find a particular candidate on this page, do ask them to fill the Candidate Information Form as soon as possible.

How was the money spent? Tenders, job codes, bills:

  • Click on the sections corresponding to complaints, tenders and bills, to get a feel of what are the problems, what is being addressed, how much money is being spent, and is it really happening on ground.
  • Scroll using your arrow keys to see the details within the sections.

Click here to view the raw data.

What’s bothering the residents? Complaints represented in a wordcloud:

Data Courtesy

BBMP, Janaagraha, BBMP Restructuring Committee website

Disclaimer: This data is an extract; it is not complete, and not verified independently. It is not from the entire tenure of BBMP council 2010-15.

Comments:

  1. Afsar says:

    Good Morning

    Over all Sarvagna Nagar is in bad shape – no sweepers, no supervisor, no marshals. It goes on for weeks even months before any isuue is noticed or corrected.

    At this rate be sure Sarvagna Nagar ward no. 79 will become a slum.

    Please arrange a walk thru all areas and arrange a thorough cleaning.

    We need action Mr. MLA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…