Commissioner demands that BBMP be brought into a disciplined financial system

Data shows that recent years have been better in terms of estimated and actual money received by the BBMP, but there is a need for better planning and transparency on the expenditure front.

The cash-strapped municipality of Bengaluru, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has acknowledged the long-known financial problems the BBMP is facing. BBMP is unable to fund the pending infrastructure projects, with amounts payable by the BBMP including pending bills mounting upto Rs 15,428.67 crore.

BBMP Commissioner N Manjunatha Prasad formally wrote to the Karnataka Urban Development Department asking that the BBMP be brought under the ambit of Karnataka Local Fund authorities and Fiscal Responsibility Act, 2003. The act says the local body must compulsorily try to achieve ‘sufficient revenue surplus’ – excess of income generated in comparison to projected income. The commissioner has sought a system to restore financial discipline in BBMP,  to match the amount earned with the expenditure.

According to the letter, the civic body owes the following amounts:

  • Rs 15,428.67 crore for various planned and completed works
  • Rs 652.43 crore to the State Bank of India (SBI)
  • Rs 54.30 crore to Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation (KUIDFC)

The details of the Rs 15,428.67 Crore are as below:

Pending bills for completed works, as per online data from Feb 1 2018 1337 Cr
Works in progress till Feb 1, 2018 7221.18 Cr
Works for which work order has been given but yet to start 124.1 Cr
Works in tendering stage, with job code 1502.09 Cr
Works yet to be tendered, which have been given job code 1836.63 Cr
Approved works yet to be given job code 3407.27 Cr
Total 15428.67 Cr

The data given in the letter shows that once in a while, the BBMP spends more than what they earn, and the spill-over bills are paid in the next year. Regular infrastructure and maintenance works become the casualty in the process, as the city has seen over the years, with problems in waste management, roads, traffic and potholes troubling the city often.

The data in the letter shows that the gap between budgeted figures and actual figures is actually closing during recent years, while it was about 35-40% until 2014. Receipts have been improving gradually, as per the data.

Data reveals that in 2015-16, the budget was more realistic than ever before, and ever after too, with expected income, actual income, planned expenditure and actual expenditure almost matching each other. It can be recalled that BBMP election was held in 2015, hence a full-fledged budget could not be presented at the end of the financial year 2014-15.

The full letter written by Manjunath Prasad, in Kannada is here:

Note: Charts were done by Shree D N. Seema Prasad contributed to this story.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…