Congress follows BJP, with bloated BBMP budget

Tree planting, housing for backward groups, more money on infrastructure is all what BBMP budget puts forward. Never close to reality, this year the budget looks bloated to a very good extent.

Chairman of Taxation Committee M Shivaraj presenting the BBMP Budget. Pic: BBMP

The ruling party in BBMP, Indian National Congress which used to criticise the Bharatiya Janata Party till last year for presenting unrealistic budgets, faced the same allegation this time, from the BJP which now sits in the opposition.

The BBMP council floor witnessed a heated exchange between Congress and BJP leaders even as the Mayor opened the floor for presenting the budget. BJP corporators who wore black ribbons around their necks, protested against the Council’s decision to hike the property tax.

Opposition party leader Padmanabha Reddy, former Mayor Shantha Kumari and others vented their anger against the Congress-led ruling party’s decision to raise the property tax, which they said would burden the taxpayers.

Mayor Manjunath Reddy tried to convince the protesting group to co-operate with the ruling party to present the budget. He said the issues could be raised and discussed in the budget meetings which are open for discussions starting from Thursday. Finally, the protesting group removed the black flag and paved way for budget presentation.

The budget did not have anything significant, as the state government had already allocated the funds and purpose, in the state budget itself.

Taxation and Finance Committee Chairman M Shivaraju presented the budget which was full of flowery language and anecdotes. He received accolades from the members when he announced a special fund of Rs 10 lakh for each ward that is represented by a woman corporator.

  • Read the full budget speech here.
  • Read the analysis by Janaagraha here.
  • Read the details of planned spending for state finance commission grants and central funds. See how much your ward gets, and what work.

Councillors from opposition parties protesting in BBMP Budget Meeting. Pic: BBMP

‘Bogus budget’

Following the budget presentation, opposition leader in the council, Padmanabha Reddy addressed media persons and blamed the ruling party of using Central government’s fund of Rs 408.7 crore for welfare programmes like maintaining school toilets, installing CCTVs in schools, providing food and accommodation for senior citizens etc.

He termed the budget as “bogus” budget. “They are expecting the State government to grant them funds. But, we have seen how much Siddaramaiah’s government has released for BBMP as against the promised amount in the last three years. What is promised is not implemented. Hence Rs 9,000 crore budget is an unrealistic budget,” he stated.

He said that no new works were announced in this budget. They were merely the repetition of last year’s works. Reddy also blamed the budget of discriminating against wards of BJP corporators in allocation of funds.

He used the opportunity to take a dig at the Mayor. He criticised the Mayor for his arbitrary rule and of using foul language to address the councillors. “He uses singular form to address us and doesn’t give us respect,” he said.

‘Realistic budget’

However, on their part, Mayor Manjunath Reddy and Taxation Committee Chairman Shivaraju claimed that the budget was realistic. “It is not a Rs 10,000 crore budget. We have planned in accordance with revenue limit. Till last year, the progress of announced works used to be anywhere between 30-40 per cent every year. But this year 80 per cent of the target work has been completed,” Shivaraju told media persons.

Mayor highlighted the accomplishment made by BBMP by freeing two of its buildings from pledge. “In the previous term 11 prestigious buildings of BBMP were pledged to borrow loan. We have repaid the loan amount of Kempegowda museum and Mayo hall. Action will be taken to repay loans of other buildings too,” he said.

However, opposition party leader Padmanabha Reddy didn’t see any achievement in the Congress’s claims of regaining two pledged buildings. “Pledging those 11 buildings is the result of bad governance by Congress when it was ruling the council. Now, they are trying to get the buildings which they had pledged,” he quipped.

Related Articles

BBMP Budget 2016-17 – full text
Janaagraha analyses BBMP budget 2016-17
BBMP works for 2016-17 under State Finance Commission & 14th Finance Commission Grants

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…