Congress follows BJP, with bloated BBMP budget

Tree planting, housing for backward groups, more money on infrastructure is all what BBMP budget puts forward. Never close to reality, this year the budget looks bloated to a very good extent.

Chairman of Taxation Committee M Shivaraj presenting the BBMP Budget. Pic: BBMP

The ruling party in BBMP, Indian National Congress which used to criticise the Bharatiya Janata Party till last year for presenting unrealistic budgets, faced the same allegation this time, from the BJP which now sits in the opposition.

The BBMP council floor witnessed a heated exchange between Congress and BJP leaders even as the Mayor opened the floor for presenting the budget. BJP corporators who wore black ribbons around their necks, protested against the Council’s decision to hike the property tax.

Opposition party leader Padmanabha Reddy, former Mayor Shantha Kumari and others vented their anger against the Congress-led ruling party’s decision to raise the property tax, which they said would burden the taxpayers.

Mayor Manjunath Reddy tried to convince the protesting group to co-operate with the ruling party to present the budget. He said the issues could be raised and discussed in the budget meetings which are open for discussions starting from Thursday. Finally, the protesting group removed the black flag and paved way for budget presentation.

The budget did not have anything significant, as the state government had already allocated the funds and purpose, in the state budget itself.

Taxation and Finance Committee Chairman M Shivaraju presented the budget which was full of flowery language and anecdotes. He received accolades from the members when he announced a special fund of Rs 10 lakh for each ward that is represented by a woman corporator.

  • Read the full budget speech here.
  • Read the analysis by Janaagraha here.
  • Read the details of planned spending for state finance commission grants and central funds. See how much your ward gets, and what work.

Councillors from opposition parties protesting in BBMP Budget Meeting. Pic: BBMP

‘Bogus budget’

Following the budget presentation, opposition leader in the council, Padmanabha Reddy addressed media persons and blamed the ruling party of using Central government’s fund of Rs 408.7 crore for welfare programmes like maintaining school toilets, installing CCTVs in schools, providing food and accommodation for senior citizens etc.

He termed the budget as “bogus” budget. “They are expecting the State government to grant them funds. But, we have seen how much Siddaramaiah’s government has released for BBMP as against the promised amount in the last three years. What is promised is not implemented. Hence Rs 9,000 crore budget is an unrealistic budget,” he stated.

He said that no new works were announced in this budget. They were merely the repetition of last year’s works. Reddy also blamed the budget of discriminating against wards of BJP corporators in allocation of funds.

He used the opportunity to take a dig at the Mayor. He criticised the Mayor for his arbitrary rule and of using foul language to address the councillors. “He uses singular form to address us and doesn’t give us respect,” he said.

‘Realistic budget’

However, on their part, Mayor Manjunath Reddy and Taxation Committee Chairman Shivaraju claimed that the budget was realistic. “It is not a Rs 10,000 crore budget. We have planned in accordance with revenue limit. Till last year, the progress of announced works used to be anywhere between 30-40 per cent every year. But this year 80 per cent of the target work has been completed,” Shivaraju told media persons.

Mayor highlighted the accomplishment made by BBMP by freeing two of its buildings from pledge. “In the previous term 11 prestigious buildings of BBMP were pledged to borrow loan. We have repaid the loan amount of Kempegowda museum and Mayo hall. Action will be taken to repay loans of other buildings too,” he said.

However, opposition party leader Padmanabha Reddy didn’t see any achievement in the Congress’s claims of regaining two pledged buildings. “Pledging those 11 buildings is the result of bad governance by Congress when it was ruling the council. Now, they are trying to get the buildings which they had pledged,” he quipped.

Related Articles

BBMP Budget 2016-17 – full text
Janaagraha analyses BBMP budget 2016-17
BBMP works for 2016-17 under State Finance Commission & 14th Finance Commission Grants

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Left off the list: How SIR is costing transgender voters their rights

Mismatched documents, hostile families, and no dedicated support leave many trans citizens at risk of being removed from electoral rolls.

For Rayyan Monkey, a transgender voter from Mumbai, the SIR does not just threaten her right to vote. It also risks her ability to travel freely and exist as a woman in the country. Raised abroad before moving to Mumbai, Rayyan was left unmapped on the voter lists because her parents did not vote in 2002. The only way for her to complete her progeny mapping is to provide either her grandfather’s Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) card or her father’s birth certificate. However, after coming out to her family, Rayyan has been estranged from her extended relatives. Her father’s documents,…

Similar Story

Karnataka Apartment Management Bill: The proposed law needs one critical correction

A flaw in the Karnataka Apartment Bill, 2026 could derail apartment governance in Bengaluru and beyond. Why the 50% allotment rule must be amended.

The proposed Karnataka Apartment Management Bill, 2026 is an important step towards simplifying apartment governance in the state. By replacing the overlapping provisions of the Karnataka Ownership Flats Act (KOFA) and the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act (KAOA) with a single legislation, the government has an opportunity to create a more transparent and efficient legal framework for apartment communities. Many of the proposed provisions are likely to benefit homebuyers, apartment associations and developers alike, by reducing legal ambiguity and providing a common framework for the management of residential communities. However, one provision deserves urgent reconsideration before the Bill becomes law. Formation…