In the BBMP polls, Modi is not a factor: Prakash Belawadi

Actor and activist Prakash Belawadi responds to some questions related to the upcoming BBMP elections.

 


Prakash Belawadi

Actor and activist Prakash Belawadi is also a member of BPAC – Bangalore Political Action Committee. He had been a candidate in the last BBMP elections in 2010. This time he has helped moderate many ward level debates for Namma Bengaluru Foundation. He responds to some questions related to the upcoming BBMP elections. 

During the national elections, you supported BJP and Modi. Given the performance of the last 5 years of BBMP, ruled by the BJP, would you still do the same?

No way. Yes, I voted for BJP because of Modi in the Lok Sabha polls. In the BBMP polls, Modi is not a factor.

Are you supporting Loksatta this time? Reasons?

I believe we must find an alternative to the corrupt big parties. There is really no difference between them in their culture of politics, which is based on patronage, venality and sycophancy. I’m not secular or socialist, which at least two of them are. Or, in truth, I don’t really understand these words. I don’t even understand ‘Hindutva’. So, a new party with a new political culture.

What are your insights, after conducting so many ward-level debates for Namma Bengaluru Foundation? Do you think the candidates know their voters well? And vice-versa?

I can only tell you the obvious, that people in the outskirts are eager for change and you can see the quickening, the awareness that they have been denied their share in the prosperity that this city enjoys compared to other towns and cities. In the city centre, voters are not that fired up. They are cynical about BBMP anyway and these polls, especially. They don’t believe the council will last long given the plans to divide the municipal administration. In some wards, the voters seem to know the candidate well, especially in negative terms! I think the reservation and rotation system makes it hard for voters to keep a connect with their corporators. But I must say we were pleasantly surprised to find many candidates who understood their ward issues and were able to articulate them, with practical solutions.

What do you root for in this election?

Administrative reforms:

1) Freeing the municipal administration from state government control with an effective mayoral system;

2) Rational devolution of funds;

3) Real decentralisation down to the ward level, with widely represented ward committees that meet regularly to prioritise works at the local level, with the involvement of experts and transparent audits of both implementation and costs incurred;

4) A Vision for Bengaluru, with a plan to integrate the planning and functioning of parastatals finalised with the widest possible consultation;

5) A panel of experts to design projects, rather than politicians and bureaucrats coming up with knee-jerk solutions; and

6) An ombudsman system to address public suggestions and complaints.

BJP workers in one ward asked for support, saying as Venkaiah Naidu is the Urban Minister, he will help with development in our ward. Congress  claims roads improvement happen thanks to CM’s Nagarotthana scheme. You know the challenges with patronage mindset. Can ward elections be conducted in a non-partisan way with candidates asking for votes on their own merit?

Modi announcing special packages for Bihar, Naidu promising influence with Modi, Siddaramaiah seeking votes in the name of the state government and due to his control of fund release… all these are, like you say, part of the patronage mindset. I’ve been suggesting at ward debates that the voters of a ward, with their local experts and elders, should draw up a ward plan, on a timeline of five years, and ask the candidates to implement them, regardless of who wins. Or find the candidate best equipped to deliver on the plan. I think that’s the way to go.

Related Articles

I want a non-corrupt BBMP, hence I support BJP: MP Rajeev Chandrasekhar
No party has performed well in the last few years: Mohandas Pai
BBMP election 2015 – full list of candidates
Less educated, but stinking rich: Will this be the new set of BBMP corporators?
BBMP Elections 2015: Special coverage by Citizen Matters

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…