Centre to consult Bangalore’s public on green norms

The laws on water preservation, air, environment, forest and wildlife are being revised. This is your chance to stand up for what you care about. The consultation will be held on September 27 at 12 noon.

Trees cut on Kanakpura Road (Pic: Environment support group)

If you are a person who worries when the city starts flooding during rains as there is no room left for water to go, with storm water drains and lakes continuously being encroached, or one who worries about the environmental degradation happening in the city of Bangalore, this is your chance to stand up and say what you want.

The Karnataka Department of Forests, Ecology and Environment has issued a circular, inviting the public to participate in the public consultation organised in Bangalore on September 27, 2014, by the High Level Committee to Review Environment and Forest Protection Laws of India.

The consultation will be held from 12 noon to 1.30 pm, at Room no. 419, Vikasa Soudha, according to an advertisement released by the Forests, Ecology and Environment Department. The consultation will review the following acts:

1) Environment (Protection) Act – 1986
2) Forest (Conservation) Act – 1980
3) Wildlife (Protection) Act – 1972
4) The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974
5) The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act -1981

The Committee was set up by the Union Ministry of Environment and Forests. It has T S R Subramanian, former Cabinet Secretary as its chairman, and two officials as secretaries — one from MoEF and one from Gujarat. Other members of the committee include two former bureaucrats, one lawyer and one ex-judge. The order for the constitution of the committee can be seen here. The consultation in Bangalore would be the last one in line. People can also comment on the portal http://forestsclearance.nic.in/suggestion.aspx.

The ad given by the Dept of Forests, Ecology and Environment

ESG suspects dilution of environment norms

A press note from Bangalore-based Non-Governmental Organisation Environmental Support Group (ESG) says that this is an effort from the government to fundamentally revise existing laws, rules, notifications, circulars, orders and guidelines. However, there is a cause for concern. “Every time such an effort has been made in recent decades, it has resulted in dilution of environmental norms and standards,” notes ESG. It points to the “vaguely worded” term for the Committee: “to recommend specific amendments needed in each of these Acts to bring them in line with current requirements /objectives.”

ESG, headed by Leo Saldanha, has submitted a letter to the Committee, suggesting that the exercise of amending environmental and forest laws is best undertaken only after the MoEF comes out with a White Paper on the reforms proposed, which could then be discussed and debated nation-wide in a transparent, democratic and publicly accountable manner. ESG says this suggestion comes in the backdrop of “haziness of the language employed in defining the key purpose of constituting the Committee,” and the lack of clarification on what “current” “requirements” and “objectives” entail. ESG says the Government has not acknowledged the letter till date.

The Committee comes in the background of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s statements expressing the commitment to limit the time and effort taken to grant environmental and forest clearances to various developmental projects. Other possible objectives, as ESG suggests, are,

  • Several high impact projects which the Government terms are critical to sustain a high growth rate for India (per GDP terms) are likely to be exempted from transparency, democratic participation and assessment procedure according to the current environmental and forest clearances review.

  • Urban infrastructure and construction projects are likely to pass through quickly through the environmental clearance process, even though they may have significant environmental and social impacts.

ESG fears that the Subramanian Committee might give a set of recommendations that could potentially dilute existing legal frameworks, and seriously compromise existing rights of participation in environmental decision making, and potentially limit the possibility of benefiting from various progressive judicial pronouncements, especially of doctrines such as the Polluter Pays Principle, Principle of Intergenerational Equity, Principle of Prior and Informed Consent, Public Trust Doctrine, etc.

Related Articles

ESG Workshop :Importance of Weltands in Urban Spaces
Bengaluru’s ESG wins ‘Green Oscars’
Yet another multistorey project altering Bellandur Rajakaluve
Rs 2300 cr realty project near K’mangala on, without BWSSB’s knowledge
Mantri’s 72 acre project encroaching Rajakaluve: IISc report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Save Pulicat Bird Sanctuary: Civil society groups appeal to TN government agencies

Voluntary organisations have urged the government to settle the claims of local communities, without reducing Pulicat Sanctuary's borders.

A collective of 34 civil society organisations and more than 200 individuals from Tamil Nadu and across the country have written to the Thiruvallur District Collector, Additional Chief Secretary of Environment, Climate Change and Forests, Chief Wildlife Warden, and the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Cell to protect the Pulicat Bird Sanctuary for ecological and social reasons and settle the rights of people without reducing the sanctuary's boundary. The voluntary groups have urged the government to initiate the settlement of claims of local communities residing in the 13 revenue villages within the Pulicat Birds Sanctuary boundary limits. Excerpts from the letter:…

Similar Story

Living and learning with Nature: Experiences from home

In the fourth part of the series on ecological living, the author describes how her home was invaded by the moth caterpillars.

Part 4: The plague of the ‘asuras’ Lesson learnt: None yet for we don't know from where or rather how so many caterpillars descended on us! In the second part of the series, I described how the Muplis beetles had invaded our home. As if we didn’t have enough on our plates with the beetles turning up every year. For a few seasons we had the added joy of seeing caterpillars contend with the Muplis for the top spot of insects we never wanted to see again. And these are not butterfly caterpillars, which I discussed in the third part…