Rainfall Analysis for Yamalur watershed

We had good rainfall (1000mm plus on an average) in 2015. Yet, this summer was harsh for everyone. Would it have helped if we had harvested rainwater? The primary analysis from the project area (Yamalur watershed) observes that there is enough water available for everyone if we do rainwater harvesting leaving excess water to go to the lakes and/or groundwater recharge.  

A watershed is the area of land where all of the water that falls in it and drains off of it goes to a common outlet. Biome Trust has been involved in an action research project called Particpatory Groundwater Mapping in a Yamalur watershed of an area 33.81 sq.km. 

Now if we overlap the watershed area over a Google map and the administrative boundary map i.e. BBMP ward map; we would see overlaps with the existing BBMP wards. This helped us in understanding that this watershed consists of 6 BBMP wards- HAL Airport, Bellandur, Marathahalli, HSR layout, Singasandra, Begur, Mangmanapalya and some non-BBMP region still under village Panchayats viz. 4 villages in Halanayakanahalli Gram Panchayat (Halanayakanahalli, Chikkanalli, Chikkanayakanahalli, Hadosiddapura), Rayasandra, Choodasandra, Kodathi.

Rainfall data is very critical for it gives an idea of water falling in an area (inflow), how much is percolating, evaporation percentage, etc. The rainfall related data collection involved contacting Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Center (KSNDMC). KSNDMC has installed raingauges in 89 BBMP wards so far and almost all village panchayats have these raingauges. We managed to get 2015 rainfall data (daily and monthly) from KSNDMC except Mangmanapalya (where there is no raingauge and so have used closest ward Bommanahalli for the analysis) and villages Rayasandra, Choodasandra, Kodathi. We’ll keep collecting this information. However, some primary analysis throws some interesting results:

Raw data from KSNDMC:

Month HAL Airport Bellandur Marathahalli HSR Layout
Jan 3 0 3 2.5
Feb 0 0 0 0
Mar 42.5 43.5 44 36.5
Apr 185 118.5 128.5 139.5
May 100 64.5 75 102
June 105 132.5 103.5 77
July 68.5 55.5 59 58
Aug 131.5 187 96.5 169.5
Sep 175.5 210.5 164.5 163.5
Oct 144 148 170.5 121
Nov 269.5 200.5 186.5 215.5
Dec 7.5 7.5 3.5 3
Total 1232 1168 1034.5 1088

 

 

Month Bommanahalli Singasandra Begur Halanayakanahalli GP
Jan 3 2 5.5 24
Feb 0 0 0 0
Mar 45 77.5 16.5 0
Apr 129 127.5 102.5 111.5
May 92 78 100.5 73.5
June 83.5 96.5 100 120
July 58 49.5 47.5 55.5
Aug 186.5 184.5 138 186.5
Sep 137.5 175 175 171.5
Oct 80 117.5 105 160
Nov 229 182.5 171 201.5
Dec 3 7 9.62 9.5
Total 1046.5 1097.5 971.12 1113.5

Some quick observations:

  • On an average it rained 1093.89 mm across the watershed with highest annual rainfall recorded at HAL airport station (1232 mm)

  • The lowest was recorded in Begur ward station @971.12 mm

  • November being the rainiest month with 200 mm rainfall on average, followed by September with 171 mm and April and October tied at 130 mm 

Total area of the watershed

33.81

sq km

33810000

sq m

Total annual rainfall in 2015

1093.89

mm

1.093

m

Total rainfall endowment

36954330

cum

36954330000

L

Per capita requirement

150

LPCD

   

Total residential population

123780

     

Total residential water demand

18567000

LPD

6776.955

ML/Yr

Demand as rainfall

200.4423248

mm

   

Sustainability/Difference between actual rainfall and annual water demand

893.4476752

mm

This much rainfall is available/in excess for the population in the watershed. So if everyone does rainwater harvesting there is enough rainfall for a year for this much residential population

Assumption: all the rainfall falling is harvested. Rainfall distribution is uniform in the ward. The per capita requirement in urban area is always found to be more than 150LPCD from our experience. Commercial establishments are not considered in this calculation 

Based on this data, we want to understand some more details:

  • Runoff available- Based on the land use understanding this information would be easy to obtain

  • Recharge- how much of the runoff can be used for recharge, how many wells would be essential

  • Recharge and borewell yields- to determine the efficiency of shallow groundwater recharge and correlation with borewell yields (if any). So we are collecting Static water level (SWL) data from many borewells in the watershed. We use manual and automatic sensors to facilitate the data collection

  • Spatial distribution of rainfall- Bangalore rainfall is varying at the spatial scale so understanding which areas are the high rainfall/low rainfall would help

  • Microwatershed level rainfall analysis. This yamalur watershed consists of 8 micro-watersheds

We are still learning to analyze this data and would like to hear from you on how best to put this data to use. We would also like to use better visualization. This is what the Participatory Groundwater mapping action research project is attempting to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Panje wetlands: Greens continue their fight against all odds

Despite a long struggle by environmentalists, the Panje wetlands in Uran are drying up. A look at the reasons for this and what activists face.

“Panchhi nadiya pawan ke jhonke, koi sarhad na inhe roke…”  (Birds can fly where they want/ water can take its course/ the wind blows in every direction/ no barrier can stop them) — thus go the Javed Akhtar penned lyrics of the song from the movie Refugee (2000, J. P Dutta). As I read about the Panje wetlands in Uran, I wondered if these lyrics hold true today, when human interference is wreaking such havoc on natural environments, and keeping these very elements out. But then, I also wondered if I should refer to Panje, a 289-hectare inter-tidal zone, as…

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s climate challenge: How the city can reduce its carbon footprint

Bengaluru's high carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced by promoting public transport in the city and enhancing energy efficiency.

Global carbon dioxide emissions continue to soar despite climate agreements like Kyoto and Paris. Should this be the path we tread? Since the Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997, annual carbon dioxide emissions have surged by an average of 1.7%. This is in stark contrast to the 0.9% increase seen in the seven years prior (1990-1997) to the signing of the Kyoto Protocol. The exclusion of the world's biggest polluters — United States, China and India — is the primary cause of the failure of the Kyoto Agreement. Vehicular emissions contribute significantly to air pollution in Bengaluru. Pic: Jyothi Gupta…