When BBMP candidates from Uttarahalli ward met people

Namma Bengaluru Foundation organised a meet up of BBMP candidates, to understand their perspective on problems of people. This what transpired there.

Namma Bengaluru Foundation (NBF) conducted a ward level debate at Uttarahalli on August 12th. It was the first in a series of eight debates conducted by NBF. Four candidates were invited, three of them attended the debate. Moderators asked questions to all three candidates and then opened the floor for public comments and questions.

Candidates

  • BJP: Hanumanthaiah
  • Congress:  Varaprasad Reddy
  • JDS: R D Usha Rani

Voter attendance: Approximately 200

Venue: Shanthi Sagar Party Hall, #25, Subramanyapura Main Road, Uttarahalli, Bangalore – 560061

Moderators: Sridhar Pabbisetty and Prakash Belawadi

What changes can we see in the next five years?

BJP

    • Cauvery water facility to all
    • Scientific waste management system
    • Indoor Stadium: Shuttle and games
    • Traffic issue: Fly over, Uttarahalli to Banashankari
    • Health/Yoga centres
    • Playground and facilities for children

Congress

    • Common amenities
    • Water, road, sanitary
    • Cauvery water supply

JDS

    • Water issues
    • Light
    • Garbage
    • Sanitary
    • Protection for women

With a loan burden of  9K to 11k crore, where will we get the required funds for BBMP and ward?

BJP: Development is happening despite this. The loans are from a long time. Developers breaking rules will be fined and the fine collected to be used for development. 10 to 15 crore can be collected from developers.

Congress: We can collect more than 200 crores once Akrama Sakrama comes into force. There are illegal layouts. Akrama sakrama rules when it comes. (The moderator pointed that the Akrama Sakrama has been challenged in the high court.)

JDS: Use funds collected from the State Government.

(For INC) More solutions are available now that no one is looking at it. Everyone is looking at Akrama Sakrama. Congress manifesto proposes to reduce penalty on property tax from 24% to 5%.

INC: When you reduce it people will come forward and pay the property tax. Poorer class can not pay the property tax and with the reduction everyone will pay it then.)

Should the BBMP be split?

BJP: No

Congress: Yes

JDS: Yes

BBMP restructuring  committee gives more powers to CM on Bengaluru affairs. Is this good or bad?

BJP: Bad

Congress: Good

JDS: Not sure

Ward money goes to the BBMP.  Would you like a percentage of funds to devolved back to your ward?

BJP: Yes

Congress: Yes

JDS: Yes

No footpaths in your ward. What is the reason for this?

Congress: Due to increased vehicle capacity and road widening, footpath space has reduced.

BJP: Lack of planning. The space for the road needed to be increased with enough space for footpath.

JDS: We need to widen footpaths.

Is it good to bring Akrama Sakrama scheme?

BJP: Yes

Congress: Yes

JDS: Yes

Can we trust the BBMP officials to implement Akrama Sakrama  or should it be an independent committee?

BJP: BBMP

Congress: Independent committee

With Rs 8,000 as the remuneration, how do BBMP corporators lead such a lifestyle?

BJP: None of the representatives are depending on the income from BBMP.

Congress: No one is getting into politics for making money. I have grown in this area and want to work for it.

JDS: I am not becoming a corporator to make money.

How will you stay in touch with your voters?

BJP: I have dedicated myself to community service. I will meet them at least once a month.

Congress: Whenever they inform, I will meet with them and try to solve their issues.

JDS: I will work as much as possible. Whenever they call we will go and meet them.

How will you utilise the money that comes to the ward? Are you ready to share financial details? Are your ready to form a ward committee?

All three candidates said they would set up a transparent ward committee to spend the money.

BJP: We will bring the required officials and get the necessary work done. Every layout will get a representation in the ward committee.

Congress: We will show the details with the voters. (Same as above)

JDS: We will get everyone together and use funds for what is required for the ward.

Additional questions/concerns from the audience

  • No roads in Bangarappa layout
  • Cauvery water in some places but not all.
  • Increase in mutton shops and liquor shops.
  • How are candidates spending so much money when their income is going to be only Rs 8,000?
  • No one comes and checks in the layouts (Vaishnavi layout), candidates come only during elections. Representatives need to come  on a monthly basis.
  • BJP has been in power for 20 years, where is the money going?

Sridhar Pabbisetty concluded the debate by saying: “Your power is in the ballot and need to increase voting percentages and elect a right representative.”

Disclaimer: This is an edited version of the minutes of the meeting sent by NBF. Citizen Matters’ staff were not present during the debate.

Related Articles

Shettihalli ward voters get to meet BBMP candidates
All you need to know about Ward 184 – Uttarahalli

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…