Uber through the eyes of an occasional visitor

Do cab companies care to inform about the pricing model, to their drivers? Apparently it's all about making hay while the sun shines.

Here’s a quick anecdote about the puzzle that was the Uber business model in Bengaluru. I visited Bangalore — the city I am from — earlier this year. I’ve been used to driving my parents’ car around town while visiting; for the first time, though, the consensus opinion from friends and family was that I should Uber the entire time instead. I’m a fan of convenience, so I agreed.

It was pleasant enough: the cars were new, clean and shiny; prices were cheap when paid in USD; cars were abundant. Practically all the drivers were local Kannadigas who had quit jobs in the service industry to buy their own cars.

At this point, I discovered that Uber’s business model there was even more ruthless than I expected — enough so that I was worried for every driver who drove me.

Uber was clearly looking to corner the market; to do so, they weren’t paying drivers what they do in the rest of the world, i.e. the larger percentage of the fare the passenger actually paid. Instead, they were paying drivers an escalating amount based on the number of trips they completed in a day, irrespective of the actual length of each trip. For example, a driver got paid nothing for completing 10 trips; ₹1,000 if they hit 12 and stopped there; ₹2,000 if they hit 15; and something obscene like ₹5,000 if they hit 20 (capped around here).

What this meant was that a lot of cars were on the road all the time, all the drivers were working long hours, and all of them were easily making their car mortgage payments.

The nub, though, was that no driver actually seemed to be aware that this pricing model would change soon. Not one driver actually knew of Uber’s standard international pricing model, and Uber sure as hell hadn’t told them about it yet. Practically all of them had effectively mortgaged the cars I sat in; that led to interesting conversations about the economic model of their investments, and earnest attempts by me to convince them to pay off their car mortgages as soon as humanly possible, before the shit hit the fan.

It’s been six months since I visited. I wonder if the payment model has changed yet. If Uber has in fact cornered the market by now, and started paying drivers 70% of passenger payments for every trip (while also unilaterally cutting fare levels, like they always do), then it effectively leaves a lot of earnest folk struggling to pay off their primary asset.

At least I’ll get an easy ride.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Out of reach: Chennai’s informal settlements lack safe and accessible bus shelters

MTC is expanding its fleet but an analysis found that 41% of Chennai slum settlements lack nearby bus shelters. Here’s what needs to change.

The Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC) serves as the backbone of Chennai's urban mobility, carrying millions of residents every day and accounting for over 70% of the city's public transport share. As the transport utility expands its fleet with new buses and renovates shelters across Greater Chennai Corporation (GCC) limits, evaluating the accessibility of this mode of public transit becomes important, especially around access points near the city’s informal settlements.  To what extent does the MTC bus shelter network provide accessible and adequate service to slum settlements? And, where should improvements be prioritised? That forms the basis of this study, which…

Similar Story

Draft GBA Parking Rules: Fixing the problem or making it worse?

In a panel on Bengaluru's parking rules, experts explain how the clauses prioritise revenue generation and supply over mobility. Watch the video here.

The Urban Development Department published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 on August 11 and opened it up to the public to give suggestions and file objections. This draft is the legal framework meant to strengthen Bengaluru's Parking Policy 2.0, introduced by the Directorate of Urban Land Transport in Feb 2021. When the parking policy was first brought in, the idea was to discourage the use personal vehicles and free up road space to ensure better mobility. However, the draft rules mostly focus on creating paid on-street parking zones, off-street parking on corporation land, leasing vacant private plots to run…