The many things that are wrong with Akrama Sakrama

Akrama Sakrama is a complete fraud. There are many things wrong with this scheme. Sadly, Congress, BJP and JDS appear to be united in their attempts to destroy the city. Regularisation may be unavoidable, given the scale of what has happened so far, but if it’s not done right even now, that will be an open invitation to let things carry on as they are in the future too.

(a) The proposal does not include any penalty for the officials who connived in the illegalities. In fact, they have not even been identified.

(b) There is virtually no transparency. Which are the properties to be regularised, and to what extent? Let the government put up that list first.

(c) It does not require the consent of neighbours to regularise violations. The state is giving a free pass to people whose violations hurt their neighbours’ quality of life, as though it were the affected party.

(d) It does not have any roadmap for stopping the violations in the future. In fact, since the time A/S was first proposed in 2004, the government has not even moved a finger in this direction.

(e) It ignores the fact that existing provisions of the Town Planning Act can deal with most violations, and no exceptions are needed.

(f) In the case of Bangalore, having notified a Planning Committee, the state government no longer has any role in city planning.

(g) No one seems to care that after regularisation, the unplanned neighbourhoods will be just as bad as they are now.

(h) It is not clear what happens to people who don’t come forward to declare their violations, or those whose violations are in excess of the regularisable limit. I.e. the worst offenders are not tackled.

Let us also understand why Akrama Sakrama is happening, despite all these. Because the correct way to fix the broken system – through new town planning schemes, transparently, with neighbours’ consent, etc. – requires hard work, patience and diligence over years. Not wanting to do this, the government is giving itself a free pass, and hoping that enough members of the public will support it for their own private benefit, despite all the tragedies it will vest upon our cities.

Comments:

  1. Narayan Aras says:

    First of all, how will the RWAs know whether their complex meets all the legal requirements?? Unless there is a third-party assessment, they will never know.

    Secondly, what about buildings where the basement parking is converted to shops etc?
    These are reversible acts, which means the pressure can be reduced on public roads. Why sanction such acts also?

    Who pays the indirect costs of such acts?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…