The many things that are wrong with Akrama Sakrama

Akrama Sakrama is a complete fraud. There are many things wrong with this scheme. Sadly, Congress, BJP and JDS appear to be united in their attempts to destroy the city. Regularisation may be unavoidable, given the scale of what has happened so far, but if it’s not done right even now, that will be an open invitation to let things carry on as they are in the future too.

(a) The proposal does not include any penalty for the officials who connived in the illegalities. In fact, they have not even been identified.

(b) There is virtually no transparency. Which are the properties to be regularised, and to what extent? Let the government put up that list first.

(c) It does not require the consent of neighbours to regularise violations. The state is giving a free pass to people whose violations hurt their neighbours’ quality of life, as though it were the affected party.

(d) It does not have any roadmap for stopping the violations in the future. In fact, since the time A/S was first proposed in 2004, the government has not even moved a finger in this direction.

(e) It ignores the fact that existing provisions of the Town Planning Act can deal with most violations, and no exceptions are needed.

(f) In the case of Bangalore, having notified a Planning Committee, the state government no longer has any role in city planning.

(g) No one seems to care that after regularisation, the unplanned neighbourhoods will be just as bad as they are now.

(h) It is not clear what happens to people who don’t come forward to declare their violations, or those whose violations are in excess of the regularisable limit. I.e. the worst offenders are not tackled.

Let us also understand why Akrama Sakrama is happening, despite all these. Because the correct way to fix the broken system – through new town planning schemes, transparently, with neighbours’ consent, etc. – requires hard work, patience and diligence over years. Not wanting to do this, the government is giving itself a free pass, and hoping that enough members of the public will support it for their own private benefit, despite all the tragedies it will vest upon our cities.

Comments:

  1. Narayan Aras says:

    First of all, how will the RWAs know whether their complex meets all the legal requirements?? Unless there is a third-party assessment, they will never know.

    Secondly, what about buildings where the basement parking is converted to shops etc?
    These are reversible acts, which means the pressure can be reduced on public roads. Why sanction such acts also?

    Who pays the indirect costs of such acts?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bidadi GBIT project: Land acquisition process and compensation raises critical questions

As the goverment focuses on land acquisition for the 7,481-acre project, are farmers' rights and crucial social impact checks being compromised?

The Greater Bengaluru Integrated Township (GBIT) in Bidadi, first notified in March 2025, received its final notification in June 2026 under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act (KUDA Act), 1987. The project is branded as India's first and largest AI City, featuring an AI-integrated township. The project will be implemented by the Greater Bengaluru Development Authority (GBDA) under the same act. Three villages, Kempainapalya, Vaderahalli, and Mandalahalli are notified in the Gazette under Section 19(1) of the KUDA Act for the implementation of a development scheme, deemed as public purpose. The development scheme is spread over a total of 7,481…

Similar Story

Karnataka SIR: How to check your ASDDO list status and next steps

The draft electoral rolls will be published on August 24. Karnataka voters, here's what you can do to complete verification by August 17.

In Karnataka's Special Summary Revision (SIR), all enumeration forms have now been digitised. Out of the state's 5.54 crore electors, Booth Level Officers (BLOs) have signed and collected forms for over 4.45 crore voters. However, 1,09,13,776 voters, representing 19.69% of the electorate, have been categorised under the Absent, Shifted, Dead, Duplicate, and Others (ASDDO) list. Following the publication of the ASDDO list on August 4, election officials verified and removed three lakh voters from the list within the first six days. To check your registration details, search the electoral roll, or access voter verification services, visit the Chief Electoral Officer,…