Stop Hebbal Short Tunnel project: 20,000 residents and activists sign petition

Citizens demand an immediate halt to Bengaluru's short tunnel project, citing ecological damage, flood risks and an absent EIA.

More than 1,000 trees to be cut. Close to 100 bird species and 400 plant species endangered. All this for a project that covers just about two kilometres and costs a whopping ₹1,140 crore.

Residents and activists in Bengaluru have vehemently opposed the Karnataka government’s Hebbal Short Tunnel project, launching a petition to halt construction immediately. Environmental activists and experts warn that the project threatens Bengaluru’s cascading lake system and increases flooding risks. There is growing public concern that the tunnel will cut through one of North Bengaluru’s last major green-blue landscapes and cause lasting environmental damage.

The petition, started on August 3, 2026 on Change.org, to “Save Bengaluru’s Green-Blue Landscape,” has already gathered 20,000 signatures. It calls on the State government to pause construction and subject the project to independent environmental, hydrological, traffic and safety assessments.

Moreover, the government has not shared a Environmental Impact Assessment report publicly for the project.

The 2.2 km Hebbal Short Tunnel involves a disruptive cut-and-cover tunnel through the Hebbal area, including the Hebbal Lake Buffer area, the Hebbal tree park, the Veterinary College campus and the UAS staff quarters. Approximately 3.45 acres associated with Hebbal Lake, believed to be built by the founder of Bengaluru, Kempegowda I, have been transferred for the project. 

short tunnel constrcution
The BDA began the work without any Impact Assessment or public consultation. Work continues even as the Karnataka Forest Department has invited public feedback. Pic: Puneet Sachdev.

Why are 20,000 citizens concerned?

Hebbal Lake and its water systems:
The project will be a water tight compartment in an area already vulnerable to flooding and waterlogging. Questions remain about groundwater, lake drainage, recharge areas and stormwater flows. 

Hundreds of mature trees and urban biodiversity:
Also, on September 20, a public notice from the Deputy Conservator of Forests invited objections from citizens to remove 1128 trees. 

Does the tunnel actually solve congestion?
An IISc Sustainable Transportation Lab study released in August 2026 found that the tunnel will create severe bottlenecks at its entry and exit points. 

Environmental assessment and transparency:
Citizens are demanding that the project’s ecological and hydrological impacts be independently assessed before construction proceeds and an EIA be made public.

Owl in vet college hebbal campus
The campus has 94 recorded bird species, including 14 migratory species, seven species listed under Wildlife Protection Act and five species of conservation priority. Ecological impacts aren’t limited to cutting trees. Months of noise and vibration caused by heavy machinery, dust, artificial light and human activity can affect wildlife behaviour and breeding. Pic: Rahul.

Read more: Bengaluru’s misplaced priorities: Tunnel road, sky-deck and expressways


Puneet Sachdev, who started the petition says: “Having grown up around this campus and spending evenings here, it pains me to see how we are losing this space and part of the Hebbal lake. This tunnel road is going to be a criminal waste of money and resources and not really going to solve the traffic problems at Hebbal. The government should rather focus on the Metro instead of mindlessly building car centric roads which will just worsen traffic further.”

trees to be cut at vet college
The BDA has stated that 1128 trees would be felled for the 2.2km project. Pic: Puneet Sachdev.

Here’s what citizens are asking

  • So, citizens demand that before Bengaluru permanently sacrifices trees, public green space and potentially critical water systems, the government must demonstrate that the tunnel is necessary, safe and environmentally sound.
  • The complete DPR, traffic model, tree survey, groundwater and hydrological studies and safety assessments must be made public, along with an independent technical review.
  • Bengaluru needs transport solutions that move people, not simply traffic jams from one junction to another — and infrastructure that works with the city’s lakes and trees. 

But, despite the overwhelming public opinion about the project, and the matter being subjudice, work is progressing very rapidly.

Meanwhile, the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) has called for public feedback on the project. Bengaluru citizens can send their objections to dcfbbmp12@gmail.com by September 29.

To know more about the project and its repercussions, watch the video of our webinar on the subject:

[This article is based on a press release shared by the citizens’ collective and has been published here with some edits.]

Also read:

Comments:

  1. Vedavathy Dinesh says:

    I am totally against this Hebbal tunnel project as it poses a great risk to the environment and potential dangers to wildlife. Why the hell is this government taking up projects that poses potential risks? We will not allow the trees to be felled and deplete ourselves of green space.I urge all the bangaloreans to protest and get this project revoked at any cost as this is definitely going to change the face of Bangalore.

  2. M G Viajyakumar says:

    Hebbal tunnel is a waste of Tax payers money
    present traffic jam at hebbal will be shifted after Baptist Hospital

  3. Anantha says:

    stop this, please find alternative. Start a bridge from ಹೆಬ್ಬಾಳ flyover to palace ground

  4. Sanjeev says:

    commuters who are travelling everyday in this jam from Hebbal and facing hardship on daily basis only should decide whether tunnel is required or not for Hebbal to Chalukya stretch.

  5. Radha says:

    Against as-hoc automobile-oriented infrastructure projects that are part of a comprehensive landuse – transport integrated plan, and can potentially have adverse impact of our environment and public health (blue-green spaces, geology-hydrology-groundwater, air pollution) while only shifting traffic bottlenecks. Instead these funds should be spent on sustainable long-term solutions that are ow carbon, space-efficient, people-centric – walking and public transport – buses, metro, suburban rail.

  6. Rajesh S says:

    utter waste.improve metros,layout roads flyovers.ecological balance will be affected

  7. Lisa Subramanyam says:

    “Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s needs, but not every man’s greed.” Meaning of the Quote “Need vs. Greed”: Gandhi separated basic survival requirements from endless material desire. Nature supplies enough for everyone to live well, but not enough for endless hoarding.The message warns that overconsumption and waste damage the environment and deplete shared resources.Equality: Taking more than you need deprives others, which creates poverty and starvation.Would you lNo foresight at all. Not development but an ecological disaster inside Hebbal. No EIA. The rights of citizens endangered as is the rights of the lives of trees and birds and small animals. The creation of concrete disaster by the demolition of nature. Very very unfortunate. Selfishness and Stupidity at the cost of depletion of Mother Nature.

  8. Dr Shashidhar Buggi says:

    I don’t know who has proposed this Tunnel road without proper scientific research. As I know till now no mandatory clearance has been obtained from various agencies. This is a personal project of this Govt rather public intrest .This short tunnel will not serve any purpose. This is a personal project of this GovtThere should be massive protest for stopping this project. Judiciary should stop this project in intrest of the public, environment & misuse of the public money against the feelings of Bangaloriens.If the Govt continue this project in spite of so much public protest ,it is shameful to entire Karnataka people & Burial of Democracy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Explained: How Mumbai is losing its tree cover to infrastructure projects

Mumbai's landscape is changing with big infra projects. Experts suggest better use of government plots and improved street design to retain green cover.

Long before Mumbai’s relentless summer even began this year, the city was already simmering. In March, Mumbai was hit by a severe heatwave, with the temperature reaching a five-year high of 40° Celsius. As rapid urbanisation and a flurry of infrastructure projects replace dense tree cover with steel and mortar, heatwaves seem to have gone from being rare occurrences to an annual threat.   The Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) cut a whopping 3,093 trees in Aarey Colony to make way for Mumbai’s Aqua Line ( Metro 3). For environmentalist Stalin Dayanand, this is not just a temporary problem.…

Similar Story

Notes from the field: Why Begur Lake is losing its waterbirds

71% of waterbirds at Begur Lake are declining. A visit to one of Bengaluru’s rapidly deteriorating lakes shows what's causing the collapse.

During the Open City biodiversity datajam held in December 2025, our group examined the ecological trends around Bengaluru’s lakes. Our analysis suggests a majority of waterbirds are declining across the city's lakes. Earlier, we addressed crucial questions on how migrant and resident waterbirds are surviving across 14 of Bengaluru’s lakes, how the shape of the lakes influence microhabitats, and how a scoring system can be used to record the decline in lake quality and bird populations. The last of our four-part series turns its attention to an individual site. As part of this study of waterbirds in 14 city lakes,…