How much does a groundwater recharge well cost?

Pic: Shubha Ramachandran

Often times we (BIOME) are asked to compare the prices of recharge wells quoted by various well diggers. After speaking with the clients, we realise that they maybe comparing apples to oranges. Apples to oranges – since the well is not a standardised product but requires and includes several components and activities. Each well digger has his own vision of the well and related costs. Hence this blog post will throw some light on the components and activites that go into the making of a recharge well. And here we are not speaking of quality of activities or components – just a plain listing.

  1. Soil excavation. Digging the well. The well is manually dug to the desired depth. The two events that can keep you from getting to the expected depth are

    1. Encountering hard rock

    2. Water inflow/ seepage from the side walls. This sometimes leads to collapse of the surrounding side walls. Digging can be continued by either manually removing the water or pumping out the water–if the safety of the well diggers is not compromised.

    The size of the hole that is dug is normally about 6″ – 8″ larger than the size of the external diameter of the rings that are proposed to be placed. The cost of digging the well normally increases with increasing depth. An experienced well digger also normally quotes in a way such that his costs are covered for a minimum depth – irrespective of circumstances that might hold up work.

  2. Dumping of excavated soil. This can be quite tricky and expensive – especially in core areas of Bengaluru. If possible, try and find a place close by for dumping. This might not necessarily result in lowered costs. The soil below 5ft depth is not of a quality that is good for planting – it can only be used for filling.

  3. Purchase, transportation and placement of rings: Rings of good quality have to be purchased, brought to site and lowered into the well one by one.

  4. Aggregates/Jelly in the annular space between the rings and pit. After lowering every 2 rings the annular space between the rings and the pit should be tightly filled with jelly, so that the soil around the rings does not collapse.

  5. Well cover with manhole: The well should be covered on top with an good quality/sturdy RCC slab so that all accidents are prevented. It is good for the slab to have a manhole or peep hole so that rainwater coming into the well as well as flowing out of the well can be observed. The manhole should have a provision for locking.

  6. Safety Grille: Increasingly we also encourage provision of a safety grille placed at about 2-3ft below the top slab. This ensures that no mishaps occur even if the slab were to give way.

So, yes, the final costs for the well are based on the above. The above elements can be of varying designs and qualities and that will further impact costs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Panje wetlands: Greens continue their fight against all odds

Despite a long struggle by environmentalists, the Panje wetlands in Uran are drying up. A look at the reasons for this and what activists face.

“Panchhi nadiya pawan ke jhonke, koi sarhad na inhe roke…”  (Birds can fly where they want/ water can take its course/ the wind blows in every direction/ no barrier can stop them) — thus go the Javed Akhtar penned lyrics of the song from the movie Refugee (2000, J. P Dutta). As I read about the Panje wetlands in Uran, I wondered if these lyrics hold true today, when human interference is wreaking such havoc on natural environments, and keeping these very elements out. But then, I also wondered if I should refer to Panje, a 289-hectare inter-tidal zone, as…

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s climate challenge: How the city can reduce its carbon footprint

Bengaluru's high carbon dioxide emissions can be reduced by promoting public transport in the city and enhancing energy efficiency.

Global carbon dioxide emissions continue to soar despite climate agreements like Kyoto and Paris. Should this be the path we tread? Since the Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997, annual carbon dioxide emissions have surged by an average of 1.7%. This is in stark contrast to the 0.9% increase seen in the seven years prior (1990-1997) to the signing of the Kyoto Protocol. The exclusion of the world's biggest polluters — United States, China and India — is the primary cause of the failure of the Kyoto Agreement. Vehicular emissions contribute significantly to air pollution in Bengaluru. Pic: Jyothi Gupta…