How much does a groundwater recharge well cost?

Pic: Shubha Ramachandran

Often times we (BIOME) are asked to compare the prices of recharge wells quoted by various well diggers. After speaking with the clients, we realise that they maybe comparing apples to oranges. Apples to oranges – since the well is not a standardised product but requires and includes several components and activities. Each well digger has his own vision of the well and related costs. Hence this blog post will throw some light on the components and activites that go into the making of a recharge well. And here we are not speaking of quality of activities or components – just a plain listing.

  1. Soil excavation. Digging the well. The well is manually dug to the desired depth. The two events that can keep you from getting to the expected depth are

    1. Encountering hard rock

    2. Water inflow/ seepage from the side walls. This sometimes leads to collapse of the surrounding side walls. Digging can be continued by either manually removing the water or pumping out the water–if the safety of the well diggers is not compromised.

    The size of the hole that is dug is normally about 6″ – 8″ larger than the size of the external diameter of the rings that are proposed to be placed. The cost of digging the well normally increases with increasing depth. An experienced well digger also normally quotes in a way such that his costs are covered for a minimum depth – irrespective of circumstances that might hold up work.

  2. Dumping of excavated soil. This can be quite tricky and expensive – especially in core areas of Bengaluru. If possible, try and find a place close by for dumping. This might not necessarily result in lowered costs. The soil below 5ft depth is not of a quality that is good for planting – it can only be used for filling.

  3. Purchase, transportation and placement of rings: Rings of good quality have to be purchased, brought to site and lowered into the well one by one.

  4. Aggregates/Jelly in the annular space between the rings and pit. After lowering every 2 rings the annular space between the rings and the pit should be tightly filled with jelly, so that the soil around the rings does not collapse.

  5. Well cover with manhole: The well should be covered on top with an good quality/sturdy RCC slab so that all accidents are prevented. It is good for the slab to have a manhole or peep hole so that rainwater coming into the well as well as flowing out of the well can be observed. The manhole should have a provision for locking.

  6. Safety Grille: Increasingly we also encourage provision of a safety grille placed at about 2-3ft below the top slab. This ensures that no mishaps occur even if the slab were to give way.

So, yes, the final costs for the well are based on the above. The above elements can be of varying designs and qualities and that will further impact costs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The ecological burden: Bidadi township debate highlights growing threat to wildlife movement

The proposed GBIT project could affect elephant habitats between Bengaluru and Ramanagara, worsening human–wildlife conflict.

The proposed GBIT project has generated considerable debate regarding its potential ecological impacts on the Bengaluru–Ramanagara landscape. Two overarching concerns include the loss of highly productive agricultural land, and the transformation of the region's existing natural ecosystems. In particular, the large-scale loss of tree cover and waterbodies has attracted significant public attention. However, another key ecological dimension is wildlife habitats and animal mobility. Unlike agricultural fields or trees, wildlife movement is dynamic and spans diverse landscapes. The area between Bengaluru and Ramanagara is marked by recurring human–wildlife conflicts, particularly human–elephant. Understanding these elephant movements is crucial  for addressing broader ecological…

Similar Story

Protect wetlands and prevent flooding: Citizen’s Charter for Pallikaranai Watershed

Through the report, the Pallikaranai Collective demands urgent action to stop encroachment and concretisation in Chennai's wetlands.

The Citizen’s Charter for the Pallikaranai Watershed has called for watershed-based planning and immediate implementation of state policies to protect wetlands and waterways in one of Chennai's most flood-prone areas. The charter, compiled by the Oorvani Foundation and the Chennai Wetlands Action Collective (CWAC), was released on Wednesday by the Pallikaranai Collective, a coalition of civil society organisations, environmental groups, resident welfare associations, activists and conservation experts striving to protect the Pallikaranai watershed region. The report documents issues ranging from wetland degradation, encroachment by construction projects, sewage and solid waste pollution and blocked canals to poorly planned restoration works and…