Kannada signage rules in Bengaluru: A history

In 2008, a new rule under the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act (1963) mandated the use of Kannada in signboards.

The Karnataka government introduced new rules on the use of Kannada on signboards in Bengaluru last week. The move follows protests by the group Kannada Rakshana Vedike (KRV), on December 27th, during which shops without Kannada signboards were vandalised. But this is not the first time that Kannada activists have demanded Kannada signage nor is it the first time that the government has tried introducing rules regarding Kannada.

Signage rules in 2008

Activists promoting the Kannada language have repeatedly noted that the majority of Karnataka speak, read and write in Kannada and the people of the state deserve signage in the language. Kannada is the first language or mother tongue for 44.5% of Bengaluru’s population. But the city’s businesses do not always follow this rule.


Read more: Hindi vs Kannada debate in Bengaluru: Where is it heading?


In 2008, the state government included a rule under the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act (1963) that mandated the use of Kannada in signboards. The rule (24A) emphasised the need to make Kannada prominent on the signboard:

“The name Board of every establishment shall be in Kannada and wherever other languages are also used, the versions in such other languages shall be below the Kannada version. The name Board in Kannada version shall be written more predominantly by providing more space than for other languages, if any”. The amended rules included a fine for violation of the rules.

A signboard in Kannada and English
Representative image. Pic: adbash via Flickr (CC BY NC SA)

The rules were challenged by the telecom company Vodafone Essar South and struck down by the Karnataka High Court (HC) because of technical issues. The Shops and Commercial Establishments Act was a labour law passed to protect workers’ rights in businesses. In its 2014 judgement, the High Court noted that the Kannada rule passed with the intention to promote Kannada had no place in the Act. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court order.  

Despite the rule being struck down, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) continued to issue notices to establishments trying to enforce the Kannada rule. In 2019, the civic body removed name boards and signs in English from shops, malls and restaurants. They also threatened to revoke trade licenses of businesses that did not introduce Kannada signage. These orders were stayed by the Karnataka High Court again.

A new law follows

However, Kannada groups have consistently asked for signage in the language in the city. In 2018, the Kannada Development Authority began to draft new legislation to promote Kannada. In  2022, the state assembly and legislative council passed The Kannada Language Comprehensive Development Act, 2022.

Section 17 (6) of this Act is related to signage: The upper half portion of boards displaying the names of Commercial, Industrial and Business Undertakings, Trusts, Counselling Centre’s, Hospitals, Laboratories, Amusement Centres and Hotels etc., functioning with the approval and sanction of Government or local authorities, shall be in Kannada and lower half can be in any other language.” 

Despite the Act being passed in 2022, Kannada activists were unhappy because the signage rule was not being implemented in Bengaluru.

On December 28, 2023, the rule Kannada Rakshana Vedike launched a protest asking for the rule to be implemented. The protest turned violent in some parts of the city. Protestors tore down signs from malls, restaurants and shops across the city. Several KRV activists, including the state president Narayana Gowda were arrested.

Protest following arrest of KRV State President Narayana Gowda
via @KCShekarGowda

Sixty percent rule

While Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said that violent protests would not be tolerated, he has expressed support to the sentiment. On January 6th, the State Cabinet passed an ordinance, amending the 17(6) rule. It would now be mandatory to make 60% of the signage in Kannada, as opposed to only the upper half of the board.

CM Siddaramaiah announcing the 60% rule on his X(Twitter) page

Businesses have until February 2024 to implement the new rules at their establishments. The penalties for not following the rule are, as per the Act, fines of Rs 5,000 and Rs 10,000 for the first and second offence, respectively, and fine of Rs 20,000 for every subsequent offence and cancellation of the trade license.

So far, no legal challenges have been issued to the new rules.

Part 2 of this series will focus on the history of the Kannada movement in Bengaluru

Also read:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…