Kannada signage rules in Bengaluru: A history

In 2008, a new rule under the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act (1963) mandated the use of Kannada in signboards.

The Karnataka government introduced new rules on the use of Kannada on signboards in Bengaluru last week. The move follows protests by the group Kannada Rakshana Vedike (KRV), on December 27th, during which shops without Kannada signboards were vandalised. But this is not the first time that Kannada activists have demanded Kannada signage nor is it the first time that the government has tried introducing rules regarding Kannada.

Signage rules in 2008

Activists promoting the Kannada language have repeatedly noted that the majority of Karnataka speak, read and write in Kannada and the people of the state deserve signage in the language. Kannada is the first language or mother tongue for 44.5% of Bengaluru’s population. But the city’s businesses do not always follow this rule.


Read more: Hindi vs Kannada debate in Bengaluru: Where is it heading?


In 2008, the state government included a rule under the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act (1963) that mandated the use of Kannada in signboards. The rule (24A) emphasised the need to make Kannada prominent on the signboard:

“The name Board of every establishment shall be in Kannada and wherever other languages are also used, the versions in such other languages shall be below the Kannada version. The name Board in Kannada version shall be written more predominantly by providing more space than for other languages, if any”. The amended rules included a fine for violation of the rules.

A signboard in Kannada and English
Representative image. Pic: adbash via Flickr (CC BY NC SA)

The rules were challenged by the telecom company Vodafone Essar South and struck down by the Karnataka High Court (HC) because of technical issues. The Shops and Commercial Establishments Act was a labour law passed to protect workers’ rights in businesses. In its 2014 judgement, the High Court noted that the Kannada rule passed with the intention to promote Kannada had no place in the Act. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court order.  

Despite the rule being struck down, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) continued to issue notices to establishments trying to enforce the Kannada rule. In 2019, the civic body removed name boards and signs in English from shops, malls and restaurants. They also threatened to revoke trade licenses of businesses that did not introduce Kannada signage. These orders were stayed by the Karnataka High Court again.

A new law follows

However, Kannada groups have consistently asked for signage in the language in the city. In 2018, the Kannada Development Authority began to draft new legislation to promote Kannada. In  2022, the state assembly and legislative council passed The Kannada Language Comprehensive Development Act, 2022.

Section 17 (6) of this Act is related to signage: The upper half portion of boards displaying the names of Commercial, Industrial and Business Undertakings, Trusts, Counselling Centre’s, Hospitals, Laboratories, Amusement Centres and Hotels etc., functioning with the approval and sanction of Government or local authorities, shall be in Kannada and lower half can be in any other language.” 

Despite the Act being passed in 2022, Kannada activists were unhappy because the signage rule was not being implemented in Bengaluru.

On December 28, 2023, the rule Kannada Rakshana Vedike launched a protest asking for the rule to be implemented. The protest turned violent in some parts of the city. Protestors tore down signs from malls, restaurants and shops across the city. Several KRV activists, including the state president Narayana Gowda were arrested.

Protest following arrest of KRV State President Narayana Gowda
via @KCShekarGowda

Sixty percent rule

While Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said that violent protests would not be tolerated, he has expressed support to the sentiment. On January 6th, the State Cabinet passed an ordinance, amending the 17(6) rule. It would now be mandatory to make 60% of the signage in Kannada, as opposed to only the upper half of the board.

CM Siddaramaiah announcing the 60% rule on his X(Twitter) page

Businesses have until February 2024 to implement the new rules at their establishments. The penalties for not following the rule are, as per the Act, fines of Rs 5,000 and Rs 10,000 for the first and second offence, respectively, and fine of Rs 20,000 for every subsequent offence and cancellation of the trade license.

So far, no legal challenges have been issued to the new rules.

Part 2 of this series will focus on the history of the Kannada movement in Bengaluru

Also read:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…