Is solving public problems worth anything politically?

Over the years, I have had one debate repeatedly – is ‘solving public problems’ worth anything politically? I think so, and pretty much all of what I think is political in my life revolves around this thinking. I like the idea of solving problems, I believe it excites those who try, and is a real contribution to tackling the problems the country faces. That’s why, day in and day out, I talk about problems and their solutions – especially in cities.

The argument I have heard the most against this, is that this is not political enough. Winning elections takes something else, and that something requires more than a focus on problem solving.

But we have never given problem-solving a fair chance, politically. Nearly 90% of the people who want change, think it is going to happen after they become politically significant, not before. I don’t believe that. I think it is both possible and necessary to be change-makers whether one is in power or not. In fact, doing good things before one is in power could potentially make it much easier to do the right thing after winning.

We have to give ourselves a better shot at changing the country for good, than to believe that ‘power’ is the essence of such change. While power is certainly alluring, it is also that much more uncertain as an instrument of change. A focus on solving problems, on the other hand, is capable of generating the base of support needed to seek political change too. But we have to invest in this, genuinely, and over a long time. It’s not a quick fix, I admit, but at least it’s a real one.

Off late, I’ve spent a lot of time talking to young people in many cities, and everywhere I go I see the same thing. People want change, and they are willing to work for it, in small and big ways, in their own neighbourhoods and cities. The challenge for new politics is to build scale into this – and genuinely increase the number of problem solvers in the country. ‘Each one a change maker’ is a model we can trust and invest in, both for development and for politics. These are not mutually exclusive.

Comments:

  1. Bheema Upadhyaya says:

    Mahesh, we have been working in very small way to change our own residential area for better infrastructure, more cleaner and thus be change makers. Few tiniest problems found, may look funny, but it takes our very spirit to work on “change”.

    a) Petty thieves : These people are simply not traceable, not controllable, not worthy for even a police complaint.

    b) The people from adjacent or nearby areas : Believe it or not. People dont like our area to be “better” than other areas. All to be “uniform”. So they “manage” to bring to “normal”.

    c) When we create a infrastructure, the things become “resource”. We are very happy about it. But instead of using the resource, resource itself will either be damaged or lifted away.

    d) And people are ignorant, for example, people dont recognize the effort. For example, if they find a place beautified by change makers, the very next bluntly place is defaced.

    Very very hard. Period.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

City Buzz: Budget’s Brand Bengaluru boost | Rise in plastic dependency…and more

Other news: Curb on plastic use in food preparation, Delhi speeds up Yamuna clean-up and new launches dominate home sales.

Brand Bengaluru gets a boost in the budget In his 16th Budget presented in the Karnataka Assembly, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah announced the allocation of ₹1,800 crore for 21 projects under Brand Bengaluru, ₹3,000 crore to tackle weather-related challenges, and ₹555 crore for Phase 5 of the Cauvery water supply project. Bengaluru's urban mobility was highlighted, with the following plans — Namma Metro network's extension up to Kempegowda International Airport, an 18.5 km-long North-South tunnel from Hebbal Esteem Mall to Silk Board Junction for ₹15,000 crore, 40.5 km double-decker flyovers, 300 km of new roads and the Bengaluru Suburban Railway Project with…

Similar Story

Apartment regulation laws in Karnataka: Why we need urgent reforms

Part 1 of this three-part series on laws that govern Bengaluru's apartment ownership explores regulatory confusion and the need for clarity.

The rapid growth of apartment complexes in Bengaluru reflects the soaring urban housing demand. Stringent housing regulatory frameworks are essential for the balanced growth of the real estate sector. Currently, the apartment regulatory landscape in Karnataka is the cause of jurisdictional confusion and legal disputes. So, it is important to highlight the legal and practical challenges faced by apartment owners and associations. This assumes importance in the light of speculations of a proposed new legislative framework to govern apartments in the State.  Housing laws in Karnataka The Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as KCSA, 1959): The Act…