Is solving public problems worth anything politically?

Over the years, I have had one debate repeatedly – is ‘solving public problems’ worth anything politically? I think so, and pretty much all of what I think is political in my life revolves around this thinking. I like the idea of solving problems, I believe it excites those who try, and is a real contribution to tackling the problems the country faces. That’s why, day in and day out, I talk about problems and their solutions – especially in cities.

The argument I have heard the most against this, is that this is not political enough. Winning elections takes something else, and that something requires more than a focus on problem solving.

But we have never given problem-solving a fair chance, politically. Nearly 90% of the people who want change, think it is going to happen after they become politically significant, not before. I don’t believe that. I think it is both possible and necessary to be change-makers whether one is in power or not. In fact, doing good things before one is in power could potentially make it much easier to do the right thing after winning.

We have to give ourselves a better shot at changing the country for good, than to believe that ‘power’ is the essence of such change. While power is certainly alluring, it is also that much more uncertain as an instrument of change. A focus on solving problems, on the other hand, is capable of generating the base of support needed to seek political change too. But we have to invest in this, genuinely, and over a long time. It’s not a quick fix, I admit, but at least it’s a real one.

Off late, I’ve spent a lot of time talking to young people in many cities, and everywhere I go I see the same thing. People want change, and they are willing to work for it, in small and big ways, in their own neighbourhoods and cities. The challenge for new politics is to build scale into this – and genuinely increase the number of problem solvers in the country. ‘Each one a change maker’ is a model we can trust and invest in, both for development and for politics. These are not mutually exclusive.

Comments:

  1. Bheema Upadhyaya says:

    Mahesh, we have been working in very small way to change our own residential area for better infrastructure, more cleaner and thus be change makers. Few tiniest problems found, may look funny, but it takes our very spirit to work on “change”.

    a) Petty thieves : These people are simply not traceable, not controllable, not worthy for even a police complaint.

    b) The people from adjacent or nearby areas : Believe it or not. People dont like our area to be “better” than other areas. All to be “uniform”. So they “manage” to bring to “normal”.

    c) When we create a infrastructure, the things become “resource”. We are very happy about it. But instead of using the resource, resource itself will either be damaged or lifted away.

    d) And people are ignorant, for example, people dont recognize the effort. For example, if they find a place beautified by change makers, the very next bluntly place is defaced.

    Very very hard. Period.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

City Buzz: One more stampede at Maha Kumbh | GRAP 3 in Delhi…and more

Other news: Guillain-Barré Syndrome cases in Pune, Amaravathi ORR work on and no plans to outsource free breakfast scheme in Chennai

Poor crowd management blamed for Maha Kumbh stampede The Maha Kumbh Mela stampede in the early hours of January 29th in Prayagraj led to at least 30 deaths and 60 people being injured. Large crowds flocked to the Sangam area of the Maha Kumbh, on Mauni Amavasya, a day considered auspicious for the ritual dip. There were about 10 crore pilgrims.  Just a few hours later, another stampede-like situation three kilometres away at Jhusi resulted in deaths of at least seven, including a child, said police sources. Strangely, the authorities remained silent about this incident.  Uttar Pradesh authorities drafted guidelines on…

Similar Story

City Buzz: Citizen’s policy for affordable transport | Awareness drive by BBMP clinics…and more

Other news: TNUHDB residents' issues unresolved, Delhi-NCR housing prices go up and disaster management measures in Thiruvananthapuram

Draft policy for affordable transport Major reforms are needed to address urban mobility challenges, according to the citizen’s draft policy for affordable public transport by Greenpeace India and the Public Transport Forum. The policy was developed by consulting experts and citizens. The policy document recommends universal fare-free transport through “climate tickets,” improved investment in public transport infrastructure and more inclusivity in workforce policies. The main issues that need to be tackled include inadequate bus services, underfunding and overemphasis on road expansion. The draft police recommended Road infrastructure funds can be reallocated to public transport, which could double city bus fleets,…