Info for voters of Dasarahalli Constituency- MLA, Candidates, Voting and more

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of Dasarahalli, this is what you need to know!

Incumbent MLA: S Muniraju

List of candidates, 2018

S Muniraju

Party:

Bharatiya Janata Party

  • Family: Wife, 1 dependant
  • Educational Qualification: SSLC
  • Profession: Business and accounting
  • Online
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:NIL
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: –
    • Movable Assets: Self-1.9 cr, Spouse-2.07 cr, Mother-1.16 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self-23 cr, Spouse-7. 5 cr, Mother-43 lakhs
    • Liabilities: NIL

P N Krishnamurtthy

Party:

Indian National Congress

  • Family: Wife, 1 child
  • Educational Qualification: SSLC
  • Profession: Business
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: NIL
    • Movable Assets: Self-6.64 cr, Spouse- 2.55 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self-26 cr, Spouse-2.67 cr
    • Liabilities: NIL

R Manjunatha

Party:

Janata Dal (secular)

  • Family: Wife, 1 child
  • Educational Qualification:SSLC
  • Profession: Private Business
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases: –
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self-32.28Lacs, Spouse-19.07Lacs
    • Movable Assets: Self-89.74Lacs, Spouse-20.19Lacs, Dependant-4Lacs
    • Immovable Assets: Self-24.56cr, Spouse-90Lacs
    • Liabilities:NIL

Full list of candidates

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-155.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results

2013 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

S Muniraju

BJP

57562

55

30.1

B L Shankar

INC

46734

61

24.44

Andanappa B

JD(S)

43049

60

22.51

 

2008 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

S Muniraju

BJP

59004

50

46.3

K C Ashoka

INC

36849

48

28.91

Andanappa

JD(S)

28024

54

21.99

Citizen Demands

About constituency

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-155-1.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px” ]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…