Info for voters of CV Raman Nagar Constituency- MLA, candidates, voting and more

by May 4, 2018 Governance

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of CV Raman Nagar, this is what you need to know!

Background information

Incumbent MLA

List of candidates, 2018

S Raghu, BJP
  • Family: Wife, 2 dependents
  • Educational Qualification: BE
  • Profession: Business, Social Service
  • Social Media:
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: 22.02 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-89.18 lakhs, Spouse-16.42 lakhs, Dependants-15.42 lakhs
    • Immovable Assets: 30.55 cr
    • Liabilities: NIL

Mohan Dasari, Aam Aadmi Party
  • Family: Wife, 1 dependent
  • Educational Qualification: MS Software Systems
  • Profession: Asst. Technical Manager Synchronoss Technologies
  • Online:
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self-22.02 lakhs, Spouse-9.56 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-16.54 lakhs, Spouse-7.51 lakhs
    • Immovable Assets: Self-5 lakhs, Spouse-45 lakhs
    • Liabilities: NIL

R Sampath Raj

 

 

 

 

Party:

Indian National Congress
  • Family: Wife, 2 dependents
  • Educational Qualification: Pre-University
  • Profession: Public Service & Proprietorship
  • Online:
    • Twitter: @SampathRajR
    • Facebook: iamrsampathraj
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self-8.47 lakhs, Spouse-3 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-1.16 cr, Spouse-27.4 lakhs, Dependants-63.8k
    • Immovable Assets: Self-30.46 cr, Spouse-1.3 cr
    • Liabilities: NIL

 

P Ramesh, Janata Dal (secular)
  • Family: Wife, 1 dependant
  • Educational Qualification: SSLC
  • Profession: Business
  • Social Media:
    • Twitter: @PRameshJDS
    • Facebook: puttalakkaiah.ramesh
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self-1.63 lakhs, Spouse-14.22 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-2 cr, Spouse-3.35 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self-1.16 cr, Spouse-18.88 cr, Dependants-1.3 cr
    •  Liabilities: Self-7.37 cr, Spouse-21.06 cr

Full list of candidates

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-161.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results

2013

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

S Raghu

BJP

53364

43

50.26

P Ramesh

INC

44945

47

42.33

J Hemalatha Suresh Raj

JD(S)

3174

42

2.99

 

2008 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

S Raghu

BJP

47369

38

53.03%

K C Vijayakumar

INC

30714

65

34.38%

S Manohar

JD(S)

8711

35

9.75%

Citizen Demands

About constituency

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-161.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px”]

Sections:

About Poll Desk

Read more by Poll Desk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

by September 12, 2026 Governance
Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Continue reading

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

by August 26, 2026 Governance
The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…

Continue reading