Steel Flyover issue: Citizen consultation discusses sustainable transportation

It was a mix of lessons in social justice, equality, sustainability, citizen involvement in civic issues and politics of development in cities, not limited to Bengaluru, in addition to the culmination of the symbolic no-vote collection drive.

The no-vote collection drive secured 41848 votes against the flyover from Chalukya Circle to Hebbal. Pic: Shree D N

In a first, Bengaluru saw a movement for sustainable transport, that resulted in a no-vote campaign. The no-vote collection drive conducted by the team Citizens for Bengaluru secured 41848 votes against the flyover planned on Bellary Road in Bengaluru, from Chalukya Circle to Esteem Mall. The event conducted on Sunday, October 23, 2016, also showcased how the issues related to sustainable development or the lack of it were deep-rooted in political will.

Clarifying why there were no ‘yes’ votes in the campaign, one of the organisers of the campaign, Srinivas Alavilli, said that the government was already hearing those who say ‘Yes’, and this no-vote collection drive was an effort to make the government hear the ‘No’ of the people who want the government to take a step back and hold public consultations.

In a presentation, city-based architect Naresh Narasimhan who was also a volunteer in the campaign against the flyover, explained the rationale behind asking the government to withdraw the project. He also suggested alternate ways of decongesting the stretch from Chalukya Circle to Hebbal (listed here: 1, 2, 3 and 4). He ended his presentation with a video that showcased the trees and the scenic view on which the flyover will take a toll.

https://youtu.be/T6r0wt53py4

Video courtesy: Citizens for Bengaluru ;  Series production: Deepti Sudhindra, Harshad Palsule.
Video production & streaming: Rekard

Dissecting Congress, environment and politics

Bengaluru-based historian Ramachandra Guha spoke about the fascination towards megaprojects displayed by Indian politicians. He said that Jawaharlal Nehru promoted many mega projects, but later he regretted some of the steps he took. In 1958, Nehru gave a speech to a meeting of engineers, in which he deplored the decease of gigantism – big projects. In those times, gigantism was a product of folly, but now it is a product of fraud. “It is universal rule cutting across all parties – the larger the project, the larger the cut,” he repeated, and proceeded to question the timings of the flyover and haste behind executing it.

What’s happening in the case?

A public interest litigation filed by Nama Bengaluru Foundation (NBF) will be heard on November 2nd, 2016, in the High Court. In a meeting called by Bengaluru Incharge Minister K J George on Tuesday, October 25, 2016, BJP and JDS MLAs questioned the rationale of hurrying up with the project when many other projects were pending.
Independent Rajyasabha MP Rajiv Chandrasekhar asked why the government did not survey the possibility of alternate roads, and asked the government to hold public consultations. TV channels reported that the BJP and JDS leaders walked out of the meeting when the government did not listen to them.

Indira Gandhi had a ‘deep and abiding concern for environment’. She shelved the silent valley project after experts advised her against it as it would harm the biodiversity of the area. Jairam Ramesh, former Minister of Environment and Forests, is now writing a book on Indira Gandhi as an environmentalist. “I don’t know how Ramesh or his party is going to square on the book, in the background of what’s going to go on here,” said Guha.

He added that Siddaramaiah, hard-working, a grassroots politician with credible records, came in as the chief minister from Congress Party, with a lot of goodwill among people for him, in a situation where BJP was neck-deep in mining-related corruption. “Now he has become captive to ministers with special interests, what is the legacy he will leave behind?” he asked.

https://youtu.be/Pvu7MGnh_lE

Video courtesy: Citizens for Bengaluru ;  Series production: Deepti Sudhindra, Harshad Palsule.
Video production & streaming: Rekard

Belonging to a city and inclusiveness of a city

Professor Sundar Sarukkai, a mathematician and a philosopher, had joined the human chain event held last weekend. He spoke on what is it to belong to a city. He termed the movement an extremely important landmark in Bengaluru’s history. He said the coming together of people from different walks of life to express their opinion on a public project seemed very important and inspiring.

He pondered about what it was to belong to a city, and how does one belong to a city. Bengalureans are private people. To belong, is to get out of one’s comfort zone and share oneself with the public, to develop a sense of shared responsibility towards public issues and talk about them. When politics cannot create the possibility of people from different backgrounds coming together and agreeing on something, the society needs to create such spaces. There are two such areas that creates such spaces – art and education. Education is an important space that can create radical dissenting public discourse and debates. Bengaluru does not support these two areas enough – artists and education – it’s shocking, said Sarukkai.

https://youtu.be/cIYltOriYoM

Gopal Guru, a professor from Jawaharlal Nehru University, spoke on inclusive city. Cities are fundamentally hostile to poor. In many cities there are spaces divided with invisible barricades that force some people to become invisible, he said. Planners have certain rules for building a city that is inclusive, which are not followed in reality, including the current project in question. Market is being kept in mind when designing cities, he added.

He explained how the spaces under flyovers hide the ugliness in the city, and create a set of people who don’t see themselves belonging to those flyovers. Though a canonised image of the city is projected, a city cannot come into being without the presence of the grotesque, he said. He emphasised the need for technological innovations that will include the poor and neglected in the city’s social fabric.

Experts question sustainability of the project

Professor T V Ramachandra spoke about ecological impacts of unplanned urbanisation in Bengaluru, lakes, water issues, transport issues etc.

https://youtu.be/TKKdyaZzgMg

Video courtesy: Citizens for Bengaluru ;  Series production: Deepti Sudhindra, Harshad Palsule.
Video production & streaming: Rekard

Professor Ashish Verma of India Institute of Science spoke on how cities world over learned from going to building flyovers and then coming back to decongesting them by investing in public transport and non motorised transport. Bengaluru need not reinvent the wheel but can learn from these cities, he indicated. The demand for private transport, congestion, pollution etc will never decrease if there is no emphasis on public transport, he added. Bengaluru has 150 cars for 1000 population currently, it will increase if we don’t leapfrog, he warned.

https://youtu.be/wmU03yiluNY

Video courtesy: Citizens for Bengaluru ;  Series production: Deepti Sudhindra, Harshad Palsule.
Video production & streaming: Rekard

Harish Narsappa, an advocate and founder of Daksh said courts may not help always in civic battles, hence engaging with politicians in one’s own areas was essential. Projects involving big money attract attention but small projects such as footpath, garbage etc go unnoticed. Citizens should be vigilant in their own areas, courts are limited in what they can do in civic issues, because politicians and bureaucrats find creative ways to avoid implementing court orders, he added.

Katte Sathyanarayana representing Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP), Tanveer Seith representing Janata Dal (S) and Vinod representing Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) supported the campaign.

At the end of the event, no-votes collected over two days in many areas of the city were counted and declared. More than 100 volunteers helped collect 41,848 votes. The team has intensified the campaign by reaching out to people’s representatives, garnering more public support to the issue and planning tree vigils.

The videos have been embedded here with permission from the producers of the video and Citizens for Bengaluru team.

Related Articles

Citizens to hold consultation, No-vote collection on steel flyover project
Steel Flyover issue: Is Bengaluru’s Civil Society scoring self goals?
Steel flyover debate: Let a plan drive the city transport
BDA botches up the steel flyover issue by hiding information

Comments:

  1. Rao Sudhindra says:

    Simply these two ideas alternative to #SB 1. Create 6 Lanes tunnel road from Le-Meridian to just after Hebbal flyover 2. Build monorail from Majestic to KIAL Passengers from Metro and City railway station can get easily access to Monorail if its constructed. . While creating tunnel road all the work carried out under the ground hence normal life not at all affected on Bellari road.

  2. National says:

    ‘@rao
    Do you know what it takes to build a tunnel.. it should be public transport what makes the city sustainable. u increase the capacity of road more vehicles to follow.

  3. skeptic says:

    ‘@National
    Good thinking! This is why tunnels should be built at the cost of the vehicle owners – right now we (vehicle owners) are taking a free ride on the general public’s health, wealth and sanity by creating roads on public land without paying the full price of the damage to the environment and those living on the land around (Include humans, animals, trees …). The tunnel should be a closed system – nothing goes in, nothing comes out – except vehicles. All the byproducts produced by the vehicles to be cleaned up by charging the vehicles suitably.

  4. Athul Nair says:

    41000 till now/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

City Buzz: Demand for NEET probe | Heatwaves continue to kill… and more

In other news: MoHUA bats for rainwater harvesting, 100 million-plus cities by 2050, and 21 lakh air pollution deaths, says a new report.

Demand for NEET probe Even as multiple cases of malpractices from Godhra, Patna and other parts of the nation mire the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET-UG) 2024 exam for medical and allied courses, Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan on June 20th said that isolated incidents of malpractices should not affect lakhs of students who had rightfully cleared the examination. The government is expected to set up a high-level panel to look into the functioning of the National Testing Agency (NTA). The Supreme Court had sought responses from the Centre, the NTA and others on petitions seeking cancellation of the…

Similar Story

Walking in their shoes: How cities can include senior citizens in planning

IIT-Bombay and design firm Dig-Design have come together to create an 'age empathy suit' meant to simulate conditions of ageing.

“My grandfather is 88 years old. Like other senior citizens, he used to go for long walks, but now he can’t. Often, he doesn’t tell us how he feels because he doesn’t want to bother us. Going through this experience of wearing the empathy suit, which simulates challenges faced by older people, is very helpful. It's not that we don’t know about the issues, but experiencing them first hand provides a better understanding,” says Amod. He is referring to a wearable empathy suit being developed at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay that communicates the experiences of older citizens…