BBMP polls reach Supreme Court again; State seeks more time

Though the city is preparing for BBMP elections, there's still a slim chance that polls may be delayed. That is, if the Supreme Court decides so. What's going on?

Even as the State Election Commission has announced the calendar of events for BBMP polls, the Karnataka State government has filed an appeal in the Supreme Court on Monday, against the High Court single bench judgment on BBMP election.

The State government in its petition has challenged the HC single bench judgment that directed the State to hold election before August 5th as per the Supreme Court’s previous order. Initiating a fresh round of litigation, the government has appealed the Supreme Court to put the election process on hold. It has sought time to conduct polls as per delimitation and reservation of wards to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates based on 2011 census.

Notice to original petitioners

Two BJP corporators C K Ramamurthy and B Somashekhar who had originally filed petition in the High Court questioning the delay in BBMP polls, received notice from the Supreme Court on Monday to appear before the court for hearing of the fresh case. C K Ramamurthy informed Citizen Matters that he and Somashekhar had filed a caveat in the Supreme Court last week soon after the High Court verdict on BBMP polls was out, which means the Supreme Court cannot issue a stay on elections without hearing the petitioners of the HC case.

“As the State government has been unwilling to conduct polls on time, we had expected the government to file an appeal in the Supreme Court questioning High Court verdict, hence we filed a caveat in the apex court the very next day. Today we received a notice from the SC to appear for hearing. The notice does not mention the date of hearing, but we expect the matter to come up for hearing on July 2nd or 3rd,” he said.

The State Election Commission which too was a respondent in the High Court case, did not file a caveat in the apex court. An official from SEC on the condition of anonymity said that they did not file caveat as they had already decided to conduct polls and declared the election schedule. The officer added that the SEC will continue with polling preparation till the new order from Supreme Court.

Karnataka State Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Commission Chairman K Basavanna Chalvadi who was the main petitioner in the High Court seeking reservation based on 2011 census said that the Commission would implead in the appeal filed by the State government. “We are of the view that election should be held based on delimitation and reservation of 2011 population census. Hence, we will implead in the case,” he said.

CM’s meeting with Restructuring committee

In a meeting of the ministers and elected representatives chaired by the Chief Minister on June 25th, BBMP Restructuring Committee placed its recommendations on restructuring. According to a report in The Hindu, the Committee recommended to introduce a separate law to govern Bengaluru and to reorganise Bengaluru into five city corporations.

There was also a proposal of having a  Greater Bengaluru Authority headed by the Chief Minister. However, the meeting decided to take a final call on restructuring after B S Patil led Restructuring Committee and Select Committee of Legislature submit their reports.

Related Articles

Should BBMP be split into smaller bodies?
BBMP division to be finalised by June 2015
Govt will use BBMP division as an excuse to delay polls: CAF
Panel invites your suggestions on dividing Bengaluru

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…