Govt will use BBMP division as an excuse to delay polls: CAF

If BBMP council doesn't exist, the tools of citizen participation, ie, ward committees and Metropolitan Planning Committee will not function, says CAF.

Bengaluru-based Citizen Action Forum (CAF) has suspected a possible delay of BBMP election due to Palike restructuring process, and said it should be opposed.

Addressing media persons here on Thursday, January 23rd, 2015, CAF Secretary Mahalakshmi Parthasarathy said that the Forum fears that the State government would use restructuring as an excuse to delay the election.

“The BBMP election has to happen in time. Inordinate delay would only hamper the process of forming functional Metropolitan Planning Council and ward committees. The government issued an order on November 19, 2014, mentioning that the restructuring committee report has to be submitted within three months. In contrast, the Committee members have said that it would take a longer time to submit comprehensive report,” she added.

She also demanded that the government delink the election from restructuring process. The delay in election would also end up in giving more power to bureaucrats, curbing the power of councillors who will also be the chairpersons of respective ward committees. More power should be entrusted with the elected representatives than bureaucrats, Mahalakshmi stressed.

‘Restructuring not necessary’

CAF members also opposed the government’s plan to restructure BBMP. Forum member N S Mukund predicted that restructuring will not help in reducing financial burden on the BBMP. It will not result in better governance. “Need of the hour is decentralisation of not just power, but also resources. Decentralisation is a better way to improvise governance than restructuring. Departments like BWSSB, electricity, transport should be brought under local governance to generate additional revenue,” he urged.

He said measures like mandated devolution of funds to BBMP independent of the State government, formation of area sabha, ward committees and MPC as per provisions of the 74th amendment would contribute to better governance of the city.

CAF President Rajshekhar D S asked the government to issue a white paper on reasons for the governance deficit and a clear road map for ensuring effective governance for Bengaluru.

He also expressed concern over division of BBMP, resulting in decreasing the power of municipal elected representatives and bureaucrats becoming more powerful. “This will obviously incur more expenses specially at a time when BBMP is already reeling under financial deficit,” he added.

CAF also questioned as to why the restructuring committee has made no mention of MPC. The Forum has written a letter to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah explaining their apprehensions and seeking answers to their questions.

Related Articles

BBMP should be split: D Venkatesh Murthy
Panel invites your suggestions on dividing Bengaluru
BBMP division to be finalised by June 2015

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…