Should BBMP be split into smaller bodies?

It was ironic to see the Chief Minister wonder on the Kasa Muktha programme, if BBMP should be split into smaller municipal bodies. Of course it should be. But the question should not be reduced to such a simplistic one. There is a whole lot more to consider.

(a) If we say that the ideal city is of a certain size, say no more than 2.5 million, then we should ask ourselves what we will do in 2023, when Bangalore’s population is higher by another 2.5 million people.

(b) What about fast urbanising areas outside BBMP? Why do we continue to pretend that those are ‘panchayat’ areas when they are clearly not?

(c) Why do BWSSB, BMTC and other service providers behave as though their obligation to the core/old Bangalore is different from their obligation to the newer areas? Does this mean, if BBMP is split into a core city and several others around it, the state government will go back to treating the suburbs as second-class cities?

(d) Instead of wondering what is to be done, why not read the constitution and the law? What happened to setting up the MPC for regional planning? The lack of a planning body is glaringly obvious.

(e) Why not let the cities run at their own pace? Why should the state government get involved in potholes and solid waste and all sorts of municipal issues? Is that what the CM plans to do in Mysore, Mangalore and Hubli too?

Sir, you are Chief Minister of the State, with a clear mandate. Please drive the economy and the governance of our institutions, and trust the cities to make the most of their own powers, plus others you should devolve to them. We will never be able to build a great city – not just Bangalore, but any other – unless we first accept that cities have a right to their own impetus for development, without constant interference from the state government. If the Centre treated our State government the way the State treats the city, would we accept that?

Comments:

  1. Vasanthkumar Mysoremath says:

    Mr.Mahesh Ashwin is right. Big is not beautiful always since there may be many factors that go into its working. Whose garbage is it anyway? For decades people have been claiming their Rights under the Constitution without caring for Duties and Responsibilities that follow those Rights. Kasa belongs to everybody, not only to BBMP, just because people pay taxes, it does not mean that the Commissioner of BBMP must come and sweep the street if a PK is absent. Like people have the Right to litter, there are others who have a Right to live in clean environs. Respect this also and start behaving or else Dandam Dashagunam Bhaveti. All of us had it coming and time to act is NOW. We must stop and think before we throw anything anywhere. At the same time, authorities must also be responsible and provide necessary facilities to help people stop littering.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…