So, are ‘you’ prepared to compensate the victims of the BBMP demolition?

Who would be actually paying the damages? If the government pays any compensation, almost the entire cost would be paid by the Bangaloreans, given that the city generates about 80% of state GDP. Do you like the idea?

Nowadays we see a lot of of news about demolitions. The government assures us that this will continue, and that even big builders won’t be spared.

There is a school of thought which holds that either the BBMP or the State Government should pay compensation to the victims of these demolitions, because its officers failed to do their duty.

As a long-time resident of Bellandur village, I start wondering: Back in 2005, Bellandur was considered a model village, and we were free birds. As soon as the BBMP absorbed us to become a city of 9.6 million we inherited its crippling debt of Rs 11,000 Crores. A family of four has to pay off a debt of Rs 44,000. More, if you don’t count the urban poor. On top of that, we have to pay betterment charges for the privilege of joining a bankrupt BBMP, which has no budget for anything.

Nothing of this makes any sense to me.

Now, consider who would be actually paying the damages in this case. If the government pays any compensation (including the very likely inflated and bogus claims), almost the entire cost would be paid by the Bangaloreans, given that the city generates about 80% of state GDP. The remaining 20% of the claims will have to be borne by rural people who are far off from Bangalore. Who is the “victim” here?

Next, I check if this money is well-spent for a worthy cause. And I find that it is actually counterproductive!

First, many of the buyers knew about it, but just followed the gravy train. The scam was too big to fail, with a sure-shot emotional catchphrase:”life-savings of innocent people, with hard-earned money”

The encroachment caused misery to the others (flood, traffic jams). Can we expect those victims to pay a compensation to the encroachers?

Then it becomes a looting scheme with government-sponsored money-back guarantee.

Next, I check if this is a one-time exercise, or a nominal amount. No. Karnataka has a long-standing tradition. The Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act (“KTCP Act”) was amended in 1991 to regularize large-scale encroachment of government land. Recently, newspapers highlighted that a lot of government land was encroached, with the notion of regularizing it (which usually means writing off the loss).

Long ago, the state government had declared an Akrama-Sakrama as a “strictly one-time amnesty” scheme. But then it again declared another Akrama-Sakrama scheme. Thankfully it is challenged in court now.

The Balasubramanian Committee report was not even allowed to be published.The Koliwad Committee has declared mind-boggling numbers for encroachments. They are yet to be demolished.

BBMP Corporator from BJP, N Ramesh has declared another list of encroachments, which also feature in the list of candidates for demolition.

Finally, almost 90% of the high-rises in Bangalore do not have OC. They may face at least partial demolition. All this demolition would create a huge number of refugees and victims. The total compensation would exceed our income.

We are entitled to protect our own life-saving, for our own children. How can we give it away?

There is also a case for questioning if the government is to be held liable for such damages. Clearly, we must differentiate between “staff” and “government”. The government cannot shield their errant officers. And it cannot ask us to pay for this.

It is rather difficult to believe that 

  • The officers apparently did their duty with due diligence.
  • All this happened without their knowledge, in full innocence.
  • None of them benefited financially.
  • All the vigilance teams for 30+ years failed to detect the issues.
  • All the BBMP/government surveyors missed the encroachments.
  • The anomalies were never found in audits and by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG).

How many people were punished under Section 90 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act (KMCA) that provides for punishment of corporation officers and other employees for ‘for any breach of any departmental rules or regulations or of discipline or for carelessness, unfitness, neglect of duty or other misconduct’?

Even if we ignore the previous point for the moment, the question that remains is this: How is this payment to be made? Any government work is a leaky bucket. The same government that presided over this large-scale loot over the last 30 years cannot be trusted to handle the compensation scheme with total honesty. It is best if the compensation is calculated ward-wise, and liability is distributed among the rest of the public within the ward. Once you get the estimate, tell me if you really like the idea of compensation.

Related Articles

BDA layouts will face demolition only if the Cabinet approves it: Bengaluru DC
BBMP uses 50-year-old maps to identify encroachments. Here’s why.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

What is the ‘smartness’ quotient of Chennai?

The Smart City Advisory Forum was convened in Chennai only 5 times since 2016, showing minimal participation by elected representatives.

Chennai is among the first few cities to get selected under the Smart City Mission programme in 2016. As many as 48 projects under different categories were taken up under the scheme. With only a couple of projects left to be completed, isn't Chennai supposed to look 'smart' now? The much-hyped Central government scheme, launched in 2014, was envisioned to build core infrastructure and evolve 'smart' solutions that would make cities more livable and sustainable. But, a decade since, the reality on the ground may be a little different. While some of the facilities provided under these projects are under-utilised,…

Similar Story

Scenes from a community walk in Mumbai

When I moved to Mumbai, the city felt extremely 'walkable,' but a walking tour in Dadar broadened my definition of walkability.

When I moved to Mumbai in June 2023 for work, I found myself going for sight seeing to the city's tourist destinations. Though the city appeared to have consistent and wide footpaths almost everywhere, vehicular right of way seemed to be prioritised over the pedestrian right of way. This struck me as very strange, even as I continued to enjoy walking through lanes of Mumbai very much. On one hand, there is excellent footpath coverage, utilised by large crowds everywhere. On the other hand, speeding vehicles create obstacles for something as simple as crossing the road.  "Though Mumbai appeared to…