Dear CM, please make Occupancy Certificates mandatory for registration of flats

CM announced in the Assembly that only 97 high rises have been given Occupation Certificates since 2010. Arathi suggests a few measures to the government, to ensure the future buyers do not suffer.

Respected Chief Minister Siddaramaiah,

I was delighted to read yesterday’s newspaper report in The Times of India (Only 97 city high-rises have occupancy certificates) that said that your government would “take suitable action against builders who flout the building bye-laws”. As you have rightly said, those who have violated the laws need to be punished, but while this is being done, steps need to be taken to prevent this violation from happening in the first place.

It is distressing to note that “only 97 high-rise buildings in the city have obtained OCs between 2009 and 2014”. This means that there are hundreds of apartments in Bengaluru that are occupied without having been issued the occupancy certificate. This is done not without the knowledge of the BBMP because many of them pay property tax, and this is in total violation of Section 5.7 of the Bangalore Municipal Building Bye-laws, 2003, as below: 
“No person shall occupy or allow any other person to occupy any new building or part of a new building for any purpose whatsoever until occupancy certificate to such buildings or part thereof has been granted by an officer authorised to give such certificate if in his opinion in every respect the building is completed according to the sanctioned plans and fit for the use for which it is erected. The Authority may in exceptional cases (after recording reasons) allow partial occupancy for different floors of a building.”

As you are aware, occupancy certificate for a building is like a “Pass Certificate” issued to a student. It means that the building is built as per the sanctioned plan and has all the mandatory infrastructure/ clearances that make it inhabitable. Without the occupancy certificate the building is technically unfit for occupation. Violation of the plan apart, the building could be unsafe to inhabit because of quality of construction, safety of stairs/ lifts, electrical safety, fire safety, airline safety, etc. and/or the building may not capable of fulfilling its mandatory role in managing its waste, sewage, water. Finally, it is the buyers of the apartments who are left fighting to save their homes.

I am writing to give you some suggestions on what the government can do to ensure that buyers are protected from unscrupulous builders and officials.

1. Ensure that BBMP/ BDA has regular inspections scheduled for every property, so that problems resulting from encroachments and foundations are caught right at the start.

2. Ensure that when a builder applies for sanction of a new building or layout, his previous projects are checked by the sanctioning authority. If he has been denied OC, no new project should receive sanction.

3. Ensure that when a builder applies for the OC, the statutory authority completes its inspection and issues a reply within the prescribed time frame, failing which penal action is taken against the officials, and the builder/ buyers are compensated for the delay.  

4. Enforce Section 5.7 of Bangalore Municipal Building Bye-laws, 2003 by punishing builders who hand over possession of flats without OC.

5. Make OC mandatory before registration of flats. The Hyderabad Municipality, in Dec 2013 was considering this move, which would definitely be effective in controlling unauthorised constructions. In Mumbai, after the Campa Cola case, builders cannot allow buyers to occupy flats that do not have OC issued.

6. Make OC mandatory for water and sanitary connections. In November 2013, the Nagpur Municipality brought in a new policy whereby water and sanitary connections will be given only after OC is issued.

7. Make OC mandatory for electrical connections. The Hyderabad Municipality has recently made OC mandatory for electrical and water connections.

These steps will go a long way in preventing builders from violating the sanctioned plan. The main law is in place. A few policy changes will help eliminate building deviations and unscrupulous dealings and can make buying of flats a happy hassle-free experience rather than what it is today. 

All that is needed is political will and I am sure that under your able leadership your government will take the steps that will make a huge difference to the city of Bengaluru.

Looking forward to a changed Bengaluru.

Your sincerely,

Related Articles

Occupancy Certificate? It is builder’s responsibility!
Overcoming the Occupancy Certificate hurdle to your dream home

Comments:

  1. C N Kumar says:

    Very good ideas.Hope they will be implemented.

  2. Dharmesh Viswanathan says:

    Good suggestions. I came to know in once case, when asked about OC, the builder referred to a docu titled ‘dudikarna patha’ as an equivalent alternative. Wonder if that would really count.

  3. Rohan M says:

    The apartment I purchased was under the CMC at the time of launch. Halfway through construction, the area was moved under BBMP. The builder said that the norms of the BBMP were different from the CMC and hence they could not meet the criteria for BBMP Occupancy Certificate especially for the price that they had sold the flats. As a result we the residents are stuck between the devil and the deep sea.

    Is there any way out for us to get an Occupancy Certificate? Does the BBMP have a way of addressing such issues?

  4. Vinay shoroffL says:

    Hello Citizen Matters,

    YOu are doing a great job by sharing the right information.
    I think the OC issue need more heated up in public debate and should really reach it CM at earliest.

    Most of the small small apartment builders are Non-karnataka residents and have been definitely miss used the government loop hole with out getting OC for residents.

    Why should normal home buyer gets punished/penalised by government bye-laws for Builders mistake?

    No fight or action by Public, Opposition Party or Ruling party though every citizen knows BBMP and Regsitrar office, the most corrupted Govt.Services in Bangalore.

  5. Harsha Gatt says:

    OC wont be given since builders cant construct according to official rules and regulations. TO make things even, they would build extra floors or increase floor space by violations. Why cant citizens fight for increasing FAR ? why cant we have more vertical growth than horizontal one?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…