Bengaluru activists plan satyagraha campaign against genetically modified mustard

A coalition against GM food crops has planned a citizens' awareness and call-to-action campaign to be launched on October 2.



 

GM-Free Karnataka and the Karnataka Alliance for Safe Food have announced a ‘Sasive Satyagraha’ event in Bangalore on October 2, 2016, to be held at the Gandhi Statue at  Anand Rao Circle, Bangalore from 10:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. This is primarily a citizens’ awareness and call-to-action campaign to protest against the approval of the commercial release of genetically modified varieties of mustard (GM Mustard) in the country.

The fight against genetically modified food has just been revived with renewed vigour around the country, with activists and experts raising strong opposition to the introduction of GM Mustard. The commercial cultivation of GM mustard in India could soon be approved by the Indian government, especially after the publication of a report, “Assessment of Food and Environmental Safety for Environmental Release of Genetically Engineered Mustard (Brassica juncea) hybrid DMH-11.”

A note published on the website of the Ministry for environment Forests and climate change confirms that the Centre for Genetic Manipulation of Crop Plants (CGMCP) in New Delhi has applied for the approval of the environmental release of three genetically modified varieties of mustard to the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC).

A petition on change.org which has already garnered signatures from 18,386 supporters (and counting) raises the most frequent concerns of those against the approval of the three GMOs. For one thing, it is felt that once GM Mustard is approved, it will only make the way smoother for the introduction of many more GM food crops – maize, rice, jowar, wheat, brinjal etc.

The health and environmental impacts of genetic modification have long been suspect among a large section of society and the petitioners in this case too believe that the negative effects of GM mustard have been suppressed. To lend strength to their argument, they point to the fact that even the major mustard growing states of  Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab and Haryana have said no to experimental trials of the GM crop.

Meanwhile, organisers of the Bengaluru rally, too, have come out vociferously opposing GM mustard. They have released a detailed 8-point rationalisation of why all citizens should staunchly protest its commercial release. The objections raised by them are as follows:

  • Transgenic technology is unsafe and irreversible; Environmental release of GMOs increases risk in agriculture, and takes away choices both for farmers and consumers. It is noteworthy that 17 of the 20 most developed countries do not cultivate GM crops.

  • The testing of GM mustard is unscientific, inadequate & unreliable; claims of yield increase are also unverified

  • Containment of GM mustard is impossible and contamination, both biological and physical, inevitable; this reduces farmer choices and consumers’ right to know what is in their food

  • The current set of 3 mustard GMOs are all herbicide-tolerant crops but the application does not declare them so. GM Mustard could well imply backdoor entry for Herbicide Tolerant (HT) crops, which result in more herbicide use, higher toxic residues in food, prevent mixed cropping, damage crops in neighbouring farms, and destroy income that can be earned by manual weeding by women agricultural workers.

  • State Governments, including leading mustard-growing states, more than 50 large and active farmer unions of the country and scores of scientists have written to the government against permitting any release of GM mustard. Ordinary citizens too have been writing in thousands to the government resisting the approval of GM mustard.

  • State Governments, including leading mustard-growing states, more than 50 large and active farmer unions of the country and scores of scientists have written to the government against permitting any release of GM mustard. Ordinary citizens too have been writing in thousands to the government resisting the approval of GM mustard.

  • GM mustard will impact honey bees and the sunrise honey industry adversely. Bee-keeping with mustard increases yields of mustard by about 20-25%, even as it supports honey production and additional income for the beekeeper. GM mustard has potential adverse impacts on honey bees.

  • The applicants of GM mustard claim that approval for their transgenics will lead to increase in India’s yields and production of rapeseed mustard and will thereby bring down the country’s edible oil import bill. However, official records show that release of (non-GM) hybrids into the market has not resulted in either production increase or in import bill declines.

The Coalition for a GM-free India also points out that the biotech regulator GEAC has not cleaned itself of conflict of interest, with one member from the GM applicant team also being a GEAC member. Test protocols were prescribed by the crop developers themselves.

Meanwhile, data is shrouded in secrecy. Test results have not been shared in public despite orders from the Supreme Court and the Central Information Commission that require the regulators to put out data for public scrutiny.

It is in view of all the above that the Karnataka coalition has urged citizens to join in the Sasive Satyagraha event scheduled. It will be a one-day protest led by the Karnataka State Farmers Association – KRRS (Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha) marked by day-long fasting by the gathering.

There will be a poster exhibition on the hazards of GMOs in general and in particular GM Mustard, along with a display of different varieties of Mustard grown in the state of Karnataka.

At the end of the event, a delegation will go the Chief Minister’s office with a memorandum to be handed over to the CM urging him to act on behalf of the citizens (farmers and consumers) of Karnataka, asking the Prime Minister to ban GM Mustard and stop its commercial release.

A ‘missed call’ campaign is also underway, where citizens can register their protest against the release of the crop by dialling the number 044-33124242.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Stop Hebbal Short Tunnel project: 20,000 residents and activists sign petition

Citizens demand an immediate halt to Bengaluru's short tunnel project, citing ecological damage, flood risks and an absent EIA.

More than 1,000 trees to be cut. Close to 100 bird species and 400 plant species endangered. All this for a project that covers just about two kilometres and costs a whopping ₹1,140 crore. Residents and activists in Bengaluru have vehemently opposed the Karnataka government's Hebbal Short Tunnel project, launching a petition to halt construction immediately. Environmental activists and experts warn that the project threatens Bengaluru's cascading lake system and increases flooding risks. There is growing public concern that the tunnel will cut through one of North Bengaluru’s last major green-blue landscapes and cause lasting environmental damage. The petition, started…

Similar Story

Why concrete lakes are pushing away Bengaluru’s waterbirds

As natural shorelines vanish and extensive restoration destroys habitats, city lakes see a sharp decline in special wetland bird species.

Since Bengaluru’s lakes were formed by damming water flowing down valleys, they are typically wedge-shaped, with a gentle slope and a deep basin towards the embankment. This promotes the growth of diverse vegetation and animals, each adapted to a particular water depth. The result is a natural zonation – reedbeds and shoreline vegetation at the edges, floating and submerged vegetation in the middle, and open water at the deepest end. During the Open City biodiversity datajam held in December 2025, our group examined the ecological trends around Bengaluru’s lakes. In an earlier article, we examined how migrant and resident waterbirds…