Citizens’ Action Forum – A note on property taxes

Suggestions given by the Citizens' Action Forum to the government on revision of property tax through continuous interaction with the political parties, the administration and the citizens.

The BBMP has recently decided and communicated its method and metrics for property tax collection from Bangaloreans. The reclassification of tax zones has led to an increase of at least 33 per cent for all properties whose zonal classification has changed. And the new tax policy keeps revising once every 3 years, with a mandatory 15 per cent increase. The Citizens Action Forum of Bangalore is taking objection to the new scheme.

Background

Property Tax has been bothering the citizens of Bengaluru for more than a year now. And even after a year the confusion has not lessened. Probably what has changed is the kind of confusion but not the degree.

It was in the year 2001 – 2002 that BBMP, plagued by a static level of collection of property taxes in Bangalore city, came out with a novel method to boost its revenue from property taxes. It brought out a system where the entire calculation of the incidence of taxes was to be done entirely by the property owner. The BMP, then, promised that the returns filed by citizens will be accepted at face value except for a random checking of 5 per cent of the returns, and further, there will be no revision of taxes for the next 5 years.

Enthused by this, citizens filed their returns in large numbers and the revenue of BMP rose from Rs.116 crores to Rs.240 crores in a matter of three years. It was beyond their expectations. This scheme was supposed to run till 2006 – 2007.

New areas were also added by amalgamating 7 CMCs and 1 TMC around Bengaluru along with 110 villages. With this, BMP became Bruhat BMP or BBMP. The area increased from 225 sq kms to 750 sq kms. The condition of civic amenities in the merged areas was pathetic.

In the year 2005, the tenure of the then BBMP Council came to an end and the government, instead of holding the elections, abolished the council, took over the administration and appointed an administrator as its representative to look after the affairs of BBMP.

In the meanwhile another significant development took shape. The Karnataka Government, through an amendment to the KMC act in the year 2002 brought in the Capital Value System (CVS). This, then, became the basis on which property tax was determined in cities throughout the state. Bangalore was left as an exception, where the ARV system under SAS was in vogue till 2006- 07.

Following the rollout of CVS in other Karnataka cities, the Karnataka Government brought in a legislation making it mandatory for CVS to be implemented and BBMP decided to impose the CVS system in Bengaluru as well. This happened at a time when the property rates of Bangalore were growing exponentially and recorded over 300 per cent growth in property valuation during 2003 – 2006.

The Government of Karnataka had already started bringing out new guidance values every year instead of once every 5 years, which was the earlier practice. This was primarily done to increase the revenue to the state exchequer by way of increased registration charges for all property transactions. As an example, the guidance value of 2006 for some areas went up by more than 2.5 to 4 times its earlier values.

Under these circumstances, the introduction of CVS system brought in a situation wherein the property taxes increased from 1.5 times to more than 12 times across all areas of Bangalore. Citizens were up in arms against this steep and unjustified hike in property taxes. The Citizens Action Forum (CAF) took up this issue and organised workshops, seminars and public meetings to highlight the problems. [To be continued]

Comments:

  1. Deepa Mohan says:

    eagerly waiting for the next instalment!

  2. H.A.purushotham says:

    Dear Sir now the property and site values are plunging down.Will BBMP reduce the unit area value accordingly .This shows there is basic error in the very methodology of assessing tax on the basis of market rate.I hope citizens forum will take up this issue with bbmp and drive home to their mind the confusion they have created in citizens mind by the procedure they have forced upon the citizens.

  3. S.THOTHADRI says:

    i proposed to by a flat at btm ii stage.

    I PAID RS.1 LAKH AS BOOKING ADVANCE.

    THERE SEEMS TO BE A DEVIATION IN THE CONSTRUCTED AREA.

    I AM GOING FOR SALE AGREEMENT TOMORROW(05-08-2009).

    I HAVE TO PAY A SUM OF RS. 404000

    PLEASE GUIDE ME

  4. Om Builders says:

    here are we buy flats with us we will pay your property tax
    Best Real estate company Om construction and Builder in Bhopal Residential commercial industrial properties buying selling – Best Square feet – The Real Estate Promoter In Bhopal. Real estate Bhopal Ayodhya by pass Flats /Apartment Independent House , Plots , Land Property sale.
    ………………………………………

    [url=http://www.ombuilder.com] Builder in Bhopal [/url]
    builder in Bhopal</a

  5. om builder says:

    Hello friends I am from Om builder…
    2,3 BHK residential House available, with an area of 800 sq. ft., which is located in Ajodhya by pass, Bhopal. The property is vast u compliant. 3 attached balconies with all the bedrooms. 2 mins walk from nearest market and school. Very close to market, Hospital ,Bank ,School and College in Bhopal.
    [url=http://www.ombuilder.com] builder in bhopal [/url]
    [url=http://www.ombuilder.com] Property in Bhopal [/url]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Why the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme saw limited success in Chennai

While the scheme initially helped workers get jobs in Chennai and other urban centres, the implementation has been half-hearted at best.

Launched in 2022, the Tamil Nadu Urban Employment Scheme (TNUES) aims to provide employment opportunities to urban households through local public works at minimum wages. With this initiative, Tamil Nadu joined Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Odisha and Jharkhand, which were implementing similar programmes, essentially extending MGNREGA to urban areas. Economists and urban development scholars have advocated these programmes, especially post the COVID-19 pandemic, as an important social safety net for the livelihood security of urban informal workers. In Tamil Nadu and other states, such schemes highlight the need and demand for social security measures. Implementation through urban local bodies This article delves into the implementation of…

Similar Story

Residents protest high charges for name change in Tambaram property tax records

The revised fees for name change in the property tax documents were not widely publicised by the Tambaram City Municipal Corporation.

In August/September this year, Chennai resident Rajiv attempted to update his name in the property tax records of his flat in Chromepet. The Tambaram City Municipal Corporation (TCMC) rejected his online application and asked him to file the papers offline. He was also told to pay Rs10,000 towards the charges for a name change. Finding this amount excessive, he brought the issue to the attention of the press. A local reporter investigated the matter and contacted the TCMC Commissioner, who allegedly disputed the high fees at first. However, after consulting officials, he later confirmed that such a fee is mandatory, per…