Citizens’ Action Forum – A note on property taxes

Suggestions given by the Citizens' Action Forum to the government on revision of property tax through continuous interaction with the political parties, the administration and the citizens.

The BBMP has recently decided and communicated its method and metrics for property tax collection from Bangaloreans. The reclassification of tax zones has led to an increase of at least 33 per cent for all properties whose zonal classification has changed. And the new tax policy keeps revising once every 3 years, with a mandatory 15 per cent increase. The Citizens Action Forum of Bangalore is taking objection to the new scheme.


Property Tax has been bothering the citizens of Bengaluru for more than a year now. And even after a year the confusion has not lessened. Probably what has changed is the kind of confusion but not the degree.

It was in the year 2001 – 2002 that BBMP, plagued by a static level of collection of property taxes in Bangalore city, came out with a novel method to boost its revenue from property taxes. It brought out a system where the entire calculation of the incidence of taxes was to be done entirely by the property owner. The BMP, then, promised that the returns filed by citizens will be accepted at face value except for a random checking of 5 per cent of the returns, and further, there will be no revision of taxes for the next 5 years.

Enthused by this, citizens filed their returns in large numbers and the revenue of BMP rose from Rs.116 crores to Rs.240 crores in a matter of three years. It was beyond their expectations. This scheme was supposed to run till 2006 – 2007.

New areas were also added by amalgamating 7 CMCs and 1 TMC around Bengaluru along with 110 villages. With this, BMP became Bruhat BMP or BBMP. The area increased from 225 sq kms to 750 sq kms. The condition of civic amenities in the merged areas was pathetic.

In the year 2005, the tenure of the then BBMP Council came to an end and the government, instead of holding the elections, abolished the council, took over the administration and appointed an administrator as its representative to look after the affairs of BBMP.

In the meanwhile another significant development took shape. The Karnataka Government, through an amendment to the KMC act in the year 2002 brought in the Capital Value System (CVS). This, then, became the basis on which property tax was determined in cities throughout the state. Bangalore was left as an exception, where the ARV system under SAS was in vogue till 2006- 07.

Following the rollout of CVS in other Karnataka cities, the Karnataka Government brought in a legislation making it mandatory for CVS to be implemented and BBMP decided to impose the CVS system in Bengaluru as well. This happened at a time when the property rates of Bangalore were growing exponentially and recorded over 300 per cent growth in property valuation during 2003 – 2006.

The Government of Karnataka had already started bringing out new guidance values every year instead of once every 5 years, which was the earlier practice. This was primarily done to increase the revenue to the state exchequer by way of increased registration charges for all property transactions. As an example, the guidance value of 2006 for some areas went up by more than 2.5 to 4 times its earlier values.

Under these circumstances, the introduction of CVS system brought in a situation wherein the property taxes increased from 1.5 times to more than 12 times across all areas of Bangalore. Citizens were up in arms against this steep and unjustified hike in property taxes. The Citizens Action Forum (CAF) took up this issue and organised workshops, seminars and public meetings to highlight the problems. [To be continued]


  1. Deepa Mohan says:

    eagerly waiting for the next instalment!

  2. H.A.purushotham says:

    Dear Sir now the property and site values are plunging down.Will BBMP reduce the unit area value accordingly .This shows there is basic error in the very methodology of assessing tax on the basis of market rate.I hope citizens forum will take up this issue with bbmp and drive home to their mind the confusion they have created in citizens mind by the procedure they have forced upon the citizens.

  3. S.THOTHADRI says:

    i proposed to by a flat at btm ii stage.




    I HAVE TO PAY A SUM OF RS. 404000


  4. Om Builders says:

    here are we buy flats with us we will pay your property tax
    Best Real estate company Om construction and Builder in Bhopal Residential commercial industrial properties buying selling – Best Square feet – The Real Estate Promoter In Bhopal. Real estate Bhopal Ayodhya by pass Flats /Apartment Independent House , Plots , Land Property sale.

    [url=] Builder in Bhopal [/url]
    builder in Bhopal</a

  5. om builder says:

    Hello friends I am from Om builder…
    2,3 BHK residential House available, with an area of 800 sq. ft., which is located in Ajodhya by pass, Bhopal. The property is vast u compliant. 3 attached balconies with all the bedrooms. 2 mins walk from nearest market and school. Very close to market, Hospital ,Bank ,School and College in Bhopal.
    [url=] builder in bhopal [/url]
    [url=] Property in Bhopal [/url]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

The trials of a school in Northeast Delhi in the aftermath of the 2020 riots

Rioters had left the Arun Modern Senior Secondary Public School in shambles in 2020. Here's the tale of its journey from then to now.

Kakul Sharma was in class 8 in 2020 when the Delhi riots occurred. Although she was safe at home, her school was attacked by a mob. "I thought I would never be able to go back to school. We believed that the world was ending. My sister cried all day when she saw a news channel telecasting the rubble of our school.” For the children of Northeast Delhi, like Kakul, the riot meant a school blackened by smoke, a charred library, broken benches, and a playground that looked like it was hit by a tornado. This was the shape in…

Similar Story

Push government to implement all welfare measures in Street Vendors Act : Lekha Adavi

Lekha Adavi, a member of AICTU, says that without BBMP elections, there are no corporators to address the issues of street vendors.

(In part 1 of the interview series, Lekha Adavi, member of the All India Centre of Trade Unions (AICTU), spoke about the effects of climate change on Bengaluru’s street vendors. In part 2, she highlights how The Street Vendors Act (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of street vending) 2014 falls short in its implementation) Excerpts: How do you engage with local authorities or municipal agencies to raise awareness of the challenges faced by street vendors during temperature surges? What responses or support do they provide? Lekha: Well, they don't respond to any of our demands. In Bengaluru, the BBMP elections…