“I welcome state govt’s move to investigate white-topping”: Mayor Gangambike Mallikarjun

Mayor Gangambike Mallikarjun, known best for initiating ward committee meetings, has only a few days left in her tenure. In this conversation with Citizens' Live, she explains why she pushed for ward committee meetings, her take on state government's investigation into white-topping projects, and more

As the eighth woman to become Bengaluru’s Mayor, Gangambike Mallikarjun has had an eventful tenure since she took charge in September 2018. She prioritised ward committee meetings much to the pleasure of those who had been fighting for it for years, weathered the political turmoil at Vidhana Soudha, and even sheepishly coughed up fines (twice) for using plastic bags.

With less than a week left for her to step down from office, she sat down for a chat with Citizens’ Live, to talk about all she could accomplish in her tenure and couldn’t accomplish.

Her major achievement that made headlines, was the push for ward committee meetings. The demand was around for years, and even the High Court had stepped in to tell the BBMP it needed to initiate the meetings.

Last November the then-BBMP Commissioner, at the behest of the Mayor, issued a directive making ward committee meetings mandatory on the first Saturday of every month.

“This was a dream of mine. When I contested my first election in 2010, a common sentiment among voters was that we appeared only to ask for votes and after we got elected they had no idea how to get in touch with us. Ward committee meetings have now become a bridge between the BBMP and the people. But a personal reason for me to push this was that I no longer wanted to carry the charge that we, as corporators, were inaccessible,” Gangambike said.

Though the success with ward committee meetings marked a high for the Mayor, once the BJP took over state government, Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa announced an investigation into the controversial project of white-topping roads. Several private citizens had even filed PILs against white-topping.

Yediyurappa’s move was seen by many as state government’s interference in local governance. The mayor however side-stepped controversy, and said, “The money for the project is coming from state government. If they think costs have been inflated, I welcome the move to investigate it. If any officer is found guilty, action should be taken against him.”

Moving on to other governance matters, Gangambike, in response to a question sent in by our reader, said that BBMP was taking steps to equip its personnel with technological expertise. “We have the Sahaya app, and yes, our employees have to be trained in these things, which we are doing. Our head office has a wing for this. In the next one month, we should be able to set the ball rolling.”

A controversial decision during her tenure was on the delimitation of wards. So the question remained – how will delimiting the wards based on 2011 census while maintaining the same number of wards, help in better administration of Bengaluru? And how did corporators react to the decision on delimitation?

“I am in agreement with the aim of delimitation. But some of the councillors are not really happy because it effectively will rearrange their wards – the areas where they have done a lot of work will now be part of someone else’s ward. With the elections coming up next year, it hasn’t been welcomed by all.”

The Mayor was also quite vociferous about the short tenure of people who hold this office. “As a woman, there were many schemes I wanted to implement for the betterment of women, but have not been able to complete these. It takes us a month to understand the processes and ongoings of the office, and by the time you settle in, it is time for you to go.”

She said that a Mayor-in-Council was a good idea. “If we can’t have a mayor for five years, at least have two mayors in the five-year tenure so that we can do everything we planned,” she said as she signed off.

Comments:

  1. Brahmanyan says:

    While appreciating the ideas given by the outgoing Mayor, I wish to record a few comments of mine on the working of BBMP. I am a senior citizen living in Bangalore for the past 53 years. Major fault is in uniting all the villages around the City into the BBMP. In earlier days, the councillors elected by us are most responsive to our problems. I have known the few of them with whom I have interacted were easily accessible and took personal interest in solving the problems brought to them. They used to visit the ward each morning and meet the citizens. In those days there were no ward committee, but we had service oriented Council members.
    I agree with Madam Mayor that the limited tenure of one year is highly inadequate to do any job for the sprawling metropolis. But the post of Mayor is more of representive and ornamental post.
    BBMP is a rich Municipal Corporation, but the citizens do not have access to know how their Tax money is ustilized.
    All we need is good Roads, Clean environment by regular cleaning of Garbage, strict enforcement of building regulations and service minded people in the helm to run this wonderful City.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

What’s behind first time voters’ lukewarm response in these hot summer elections?

Voting is every citizen's right and duty but why are young voters not enthusiastic about making a difference in the world's largest democracy?

“Just, I mean, I don’t feel like voting. This politics and all. I didn’t even apply, I think I was late,” rattled one of my students when I asked if they had all registered to vote as most of them had turned 18 one or two years ago.  This was pretty much the chorus. They spoke about how it was too late when they tried to register, how it was so difficult (which was promptly rejected by those who had done it), how they were in a different city, how they were not interested in politics and how it was…

Similar Story

Low voter turnout in Bengaluru: Citizens highlight discrepancies in electoral rolls

Bengaluru recorded a voter turnout of 57.43%. Voters reported issues like deletions, duplications and names of deceased voters in the electoral rolls.

Almost half of Bengaluru's citizens did not vote in the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections. The city recorded a 57.43% voter turnout this year, not much of an improvement from the previous 2019 elections. The low voter turnout has often been ascribed to apathy, but this alone is not a satisfactory explanation. Several factors have been cited for the low voter turnout, from discrepancies in electoral rolls to the scorching heat. Voter roll errors: Deletions, duplications and deceased names There were complaints that hundreds of voter names were either deleted or missing in Chickpet and Akkipet in Bangalore Central.  In a…