“Garbage problem can’t be managed from BBMP head office alone”: Special Commissioner

The new waste management system will fail if ward committees don't take ownership locally, says BBMP Special Commissioner D Randeep.

This January, BBMP  floated a new tender to deal with the city’s perennial garbage problem. D Randeep, Special Commissioner (Solid Waste Management and Health), BBMP, sat down for a chat with ‘Citizens Live’ to answer niggling doubts about the controversial tender.

“The central issue is still segregation. The new policy is that wet and sanitary waste will be picked up by BBMP everyday. Dry waste will be picked up by NGOs, waste collectors,” he said. He stressed that it was therefore imperative that we, the general public, segregate our waste.

“If you don’t, we do have provisions to penalise people; marshals can check on you; health inspectors can look into the matter. The time to convince people is over. Now is the time to get things done,” said the officer.

He also said it would be a violation of human rights of those who worked in the sector, if we expected them to segregate our waste by hand. “It is inhuman,” was his statement.

Randeep asserted that the new system would be successful only if ward committees took ownership of waste management locally, as per the Micro Plan. “Unless someone at the ground level asks the right questions, the system would not be functional to a large extent,” he said.

The new tender had not found universal approval, with Council members raising many concerns about termination clauses. Political opposition seemed like a hurdle, since it is an open secret that most elected members have a stake in the garbage mafia. “This policy is about providing a better solution to the problem. We had a number of meetings with Council members, and the policy is now through with very minor changes that won’t really effect the deliverables,” Randeep said.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

The real estate shift: How Karnataka’s proposed apartment law shortchanges homeowners

Karnataka apartment owners may not get a fair share of their land as the KAOMA 2026 replaces value-based UDI with an area-only formula.

The Karnataka Apartment (Ownership and Management) Bill, 2026 (KAOMA) changes how a homeowner's share of the land is calculated — and the new formula gives the individual less than what the old law, that is the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 (KAOA), promised. The KAOMA Bill was passed by the Karnataka legislature in August, but is yet to receive assent from the Governor, who has sought clarifications on certain provisions. What is UDI and why does it matter? When you buy an apartment, you buy two things: The flat — a depreciating asset (buildings lose value over time). Your Undivided…

Similar Story

Big promises, unheard residents: Bengaluru’s new parking rules need a rethink

The draft rules meant to manage road space demand end up expanding supply, outsourcing enforcement, and pricing residents out of their streets.

On August 11, the Urban Development Department quietly published the draft Greater Bengaluru Authority (Parking) Rules, 2026 — the legal framework  meant to give teeth to Bengaluru's much-discussed Parking Policy 2.0. Citizens have thirty days to send in objections. Yet, few will read all eighteen pages of the notification. Fewer still will notice that a law framed as a way to curb traffic demand is, on close reading, a plan to expand parking supply and hand over enforcement to private players, while leaving the ordinary resident worse off.  That gap between the promise and what’s on paper matters, because parking…