“Garbage problem can’t be managed from BBMP head office alone”: Special Commissioner

The new waste management system will fail if ward committees don't take ownership locally, says BBMP Special Commissioner D Randeep.

This January, BBMP  floated a new tender to deal with the city’s perennial garbage problem. D Randeep, Special Commissioner (Solid Waste Management and Health), BBMP, sat down for a chat with ‘Citizens Live’ to answer niggling doubts about the controversial tender.

“The central issue is still segregation. The new policy is that wet and sanitary waste will be picked up by BBMP everyday. Dry waste will be picked up by NGOs, waste collectors,” he said. He stressed that it was therefore imperative that we, the general public, segregate our waste.

“If you don’t, we do have provisions to penalise people; marshals can check on you; health inspectors can look into the matter. The time to convince people is over. Now is the time to get things done,” said the officer.

He also said it would be a violation of human rights of those who worked in the sector, if we expected them to segregate our waste by hand. “It is inhuman,” was his statement.

Randeep asserted that the new system would be successful only if ward committees took ownership of waste management locally, as per the Micro Plan. “Unless someone at the ground level asks the right questions, the system would not be functional to a large extent,” he said.

The new tender had not found universal approval, with Council members raising many concerns about termination clauses. Political opposition seemed like a hurdle, since it is an open secret that most elected members have a stake in the garbage mafia. “This policy is about providing a better solution to the problem. We had a number of meetings with Council members, and the policy is now through with very minor changes that won’t really effect the deliverables,” Randeep said.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Bengaluru’s GBA and Hyderabad’s CURE: What they have in common and where they differ

While the mega-cities have split up into smaller corporations, both have put state leadership in control of city governance.

With the Core Urban Region (Integrated Governance) Bill 2026, better known as the CURE Bill passing in the Telangana Legislative Assembly, India's two fastest-growing mega-cities—both having crossed the 1.3-crore population mark—now operate under brand-new urban governance laws enacted within roughly two years of each other.  Both states confronted the exact same structural challenge: a single, overstretched corporation, fractured inter-agency coordination, and an urgent need for hyper-local administrative units capable of  delivering civic services efficiently. In an earlier article, we broke down how local governance would change with the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act. Read it here. Two mega-cities, one playbook The…

Similar Story

SIR in Bengaluru: Disenfranchisement at a grand scale

With Bengaluru Urban seeing a 42 per cent reduction in the voter rolls, is the SIR an update or a denial of electors' rights?

The CEO Karnataka recently published the final rolls for Karnataka after finishing their hurried and stressful Special Intensive Revision (SIR). People were asked to prove that they live where they do, and map themselves or their parents/ancestors to the 2002 voter roll. The final roll published now has 4.54 Crore electors in Karnataka as against the 5.54 Cr as per the 2025 Special Summary Review; a reduction of almost one crore electors or 18% of the earlier rolls. However, the numbers in the 28 constituencies in Bengaluru Urban paint a more drastic picture. The 1.026 crore electors as per the…