Info for voters of CV Raman Nagar Constituency- MLA, candidates, voting and more

by May 4, 2018 Governance

If you are one among the lakhs of voters of CV Raman Nagar, this is what you need to know!

Background information

Incumbent MLA

List of candidates, 2018

S Raghu, BJP
  • Family: Wife, 2 dependents
  • Educational Qualification: BE
  • Profession: Business, Social Service
  • Social Media:
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: 22.02 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-89.18 lakhs, Spouse-16.42 lakhs, Dependants-15.42 lakhs
    • Immovable Assets: 30.55 cr
    • Liabilities: NIL

Mohan Dasari, Aam Aadmi Party
  • Family: Wife, 1 dependent
  • Educational Qualification: MS Software Systems
  • Profession: Asst. Technical Manager Synchronoss Technologies
  • Online:
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self-22.02 lakhs, Spouse-9.56 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-16.54 lakhs, Spouse-7.51 lakhs
    • Immovable Assets: Self-5 lakhs, Spouse-45 lakhs
    • Liabilities: NIL

R Sampath Raj

 

 

 

 

Party:

Indian National Congress
  • Family: Wife, 2 dependents
  • Educational Qualification: Pre-University
  • Profession: Public Service & Proprietorship
  • Online:
    • Twitter: @SampathRajR
    • Facebook: iamrsampathraj
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self-8.47 lakhs, Spouse-3 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-1.16 cr, Spouse-27.4 lakhs, Dependants-63.8k
    • Immovable Assets: Self-30.46 cr, Spouse-1.3 cr
    • Liabilities: NIL

 

P Ramesh, Janata Dal (secular)
  • Family: Wife, 1 dependant
  • Educational Qualification: SSLC
  • Profession: Business
  • Social Media:
    • Twitter: @PRameshJDS
    • Facebook: puttalakkaiah.ramesh
  • Number of Pending Criminal Cases:
  • Net Worth:
    • IT Returns: Self-1.63 lakhs, Spouse-14.22 lakhs
    • Movable Assets: Self-2 cr, Spouse-3.35 cr
    • Immovable Assets: Self-1.16 cr, Spouse-18.88 cr, Dependants-1.3 cr
    •  Liabilities: Self-7.37 cr, Spouse-21.06 cr

Full list of candidates

[embeddoc url=”http://data.opencity.in/Documents/Recent/Karnataka-Assembly-Elections-2018-Candidates-AC-161.pdf” width=”100%”  download=”all”]

Previous Results

2013

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

S Raghu

BJP

53364

43

50.26

P Ramesh

INC

44945

47

42.33

J Hemalatha Suresh Raj

JD(S)

3174

42

2.99

 

2008 candidates

Party

Votes

Age

Vote Share %

S Raghu

BJP

47369

38

53.03%

K C Vijayakumar

INC

30714

65

34.38%

S Manohar

JD(S)

8711

35

9.75%

Citizen Demands

About constituency

[flexiblemap src=”http://data.opencity.in/Data/Karnataka-Assembly-Constituency-161.kml” width=”100%” height=”400px”]

Sections:

About Poll Desk

Read more by Poll Desk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Pre-poll report card: Citizens raise concerns over urban planning and governance gaps

by March 30, 2026 Governance
As the Assembly elections near, residents across Chennai flag zoning violations, poor urban planning amid rapid growth.

As cities grow rapidly, traffic, buildings, and loss of green cover inevitably follow. In 1974, the Chennai Metropolitan Area (CMA) covered 1,189 sq. km; by 2022, it had expanded to 5,904 sq. km, bringing with it challenges of governance. Gaps in governance are foremost on the minds of the 28.3 lakh Chennai voters set to elect their Members of Legislative Assembly (MLAs) on April 23rd. The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) government made 505 promises in 2021, of which it claims to have met 80%. But as residents and citizen groups come up with their manifestos ahead of the April…

Continue reading

Similar Story

In Bengaluru’s Kogilu Layout, evictions create another housing crisis for the city

by , and March 19, 2026 Governance
Months after the Kogilu demolitions, displaced residents still live in tents, citing lack of prior notice and delays in promised rehabilitation.

On December 20, 2025, families in Kogilu Layout, Yelahanka, awoke to the sound of bulldozers and their homes being razed. Vessels, bedding, school bags, medicines, and documents lay scattered around or broken. While official figures state that 167 structures were removed, residents and petitioners report higher numbers.  Beside the rubble, families assembled tarpaulin shelters. Residents say that for several days, makeshift solutions for water, toilets, and electricity were arranged and civil society groups provided temporary relief.  Residents and civil-society groups also allege that there was no written notice before the pre-dawn demolitions. In the aftermath, it is unclear where people slept…

Continue reading