Green tribunal allows construction on Kaikondrahalli lake wetland

by May 2, 2016 Environment
National Green Tribunal has allowed the developer to construct the residential project, after the developer modified the project plan by reducing the extent of construction.

Difference between the topography of the land between Kasavanahalli and Kaikondrahalli lakes, in 2002 and 2016, as seen on Google Earth.

The Southern Bench of National Green Tribunal has dismissed the petition of Namma Bengaluru Foundation (NBF) and Mahadevpura Parisara Samrakshane Mattu Abhivrudhi Samiti (MAPSAS) related to a residential project coming up between Kasavanahalli and Kaikondarahalli lakes.

Stating that the case on the grounds that the developer has a valid Environmental Clearance, the NGT dismissed the petition and allowed the developer of Shriram Chirping Woods to continue with the project.
In an order delivered on April 26th, NGT bench comprising Dr P Jyothimani and P S Rao, dismissed the original application as well as the appeal made by the appellant. The court observed that according to the modified project plan approved by SEIAA, the project was coming up in a plot area of 62,927 sq metres, with a reduction of 1,112.07 sq metres from the original plan.

The modified plan intends to construct 17 towers with 810 residential units as against 21 towers and 870 residential units in the previous project plan. The NGT observed that the plan was modified to avoid the nala passing through the property. “It can not be said there has been any violation which substantially affects the original Environmental Clearance granted to the project proponent,” the court said.

Responding to the demands of the applicant’s counsel to consider the secondary rajakaluve running between the two lakes as primary rajakaluve, the court said that according to BDA RMP, the canal is a secondary canal and a minimum of 25 metres buffer zone has to be left out on both sides. The BDA has clarified that there has been no encroachment of Rajakaluve between Kasavanahalli and Kaikondarahalli lakes, the NGT bench observed.

However the court warned the developer not to disturb the course of Rajakaluve in future and in such case it will be always open before SEIAA to take action against the developer.

Citizen Matters had earlier written about the project, and had sought plans from the developer with regard to the drain in the valley zone, but had received no reply. Meanwhile, there is yet another construction coming up on the lake buffer zone in the wetland between Kaikondrahalli and Kasavanahalli lakes. Residents are concerned because these two lakes are interconnected with water from one lake flowing to another, and disturbing the flow pattern might affect the water inflow to the Kaikondrahalli lake.

Full order of National Green Tribunal:

Source: National Green Tribunal

Sections:

About Akshatha M

Akshatha M was a Staff Journalist at Citizen Matters. She tweets at @akshata1.
Read more by Akshatha M

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Mumbaikars are fighting for their mangroves. Here’s how you can join them

by April 11, 2026 Environment
Mumbai is about to face a monumental loss—its mangroves are being cut to build the coastal road. Citizens, however, have not given up the fight to save them.

​“What happens when we remove this natural infrastructure of the city? What happens if it floods? What happens if the air quality (index) goes really high?” asks Pooja Domadia, a member of the Save Mumbai Mangroves campaign. These are questions that many Mumbaikars have as work begins on the Versova-Bhayandar Coastal Road, which is set to affect 45,000 mangrove trees. In March this year, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition challenging the Bombay High Court order to greenlight the cutting of mangroves for the project. Is the SC decision a fatal blow to the movement? The BMC has already begun…

Continue reading

Similar Story

Where are the pollinators in Bengaluru?

by , , , , and April 6, 2026 Environment
Despite the volumes of citizen-generated data on the city's biodiversity, pollinators who sustain the urban ecosystem do not seem to be getting their due attention.

Urban biodiversity is often discussed in terms of tree cover, lakes, or flagship species, but far less attention is paid to pollinators—the insects and birds that quietly sustain urban ecosystems. In Bengaluru, a rapidly urbanising city with a strong culture of citizen science, large volumes of biodiversity data are now being generated by the public. But what does this data tell us about pollinators in the city? This article draws from a data jam hosted by OpenCity in Bengaluru that explored pollinator observations using publicly available, citizen-generated datasets. By analysing long-term observation records and spatial data on land use and…

Continue reading