Finally, govt frames rules to address those dangerously dangling cables

Streets of Bengaluru are decorated with the black cables that Cable TV operators, hang from trees, balconies and street light poles - crisscrossing everywhere, causing risk to walkers and vehicles. What is the government doing to solve the problem?

Mahesh (name changed), a resident of Malleshwaram in Bengaluru, has been watching many cables hanging on a tree near his house, some of them looking as if they are cut. Fed up of seeing them everyday without being able to understand why they exist, Mahesh decided to check the cut cable. To his surprise, the cable was cut at the other end too, and came off easily when he pulled it.

People do not want to touch the hanging cables, because they think it could be electric cable and hence dangerous. As nobody checks them, unused cables laid by cable operators or telephone companies dangle on the trees and poles, without being disturbed for years.

Why are cables hanging from every tree or pole in Bengaluru, often causing nuisance? Why do cable operators hang them haphazardly and why did BBMP do nothing about it?

Cables of different varieties can be seen dangling across Bengaluru. Pic: Shree D N

Well, it is because the BBMP so far did not even have a policy that would regulate the laying of cables, except for laying Optical Fibre Cables (OFCs). There was none to tame the cable operators and majority of them would lay/hang the cables without obtaining license from BBMP.

As a result same roads were dug again and again, and telecom, cable and internet operators utilised same lines illegally without paying the prescribed fee to BBMP, which resulted in the loss of potential revenue.

In 2013, BBMP had formed a 10-member committee to inspect and estimate the number of illegal cables in the city and ascertain the revenue loss to Palike’s exchequer. According to a The New Indian Express report, the Committee had estimated that 90 per cent of the cables in Bengaluru were illegal. After inspecting various locations, the then Committee Chairman N R Ramesh had said that about 60,000 km stretch was dug up in Bengaluru to lay OFCs, of which at least 55,000 km were illegal. An additional 8,000 km length illegal overhead cables should be removed, he had stated.

Finally a draft for cables

Now the Urban Development Department has issued a draft policy to regulate optic fibres and all other cables in public places. The draft policy – the Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Regulation of cable laying) Rules, 2015 was published on January 14th, 2016. The month’s time for public and stakeholders to submit objections and suggestions is now over.

Here are the highlights of the proposed policy:

  • It is mandatory to obtain licenses for laying / mandating cables within the areas of corporation.
  • Fixed time frame for the completion of infrastructure work.
  • No inconvenience can be caused to the public in the process of carrying out the operations.
  • Proposed route, number of poles, dimension of the poles, distance between two poles and the minimum ground clearance required for the cable will need to be spelt out in the proposals.
  • There can be no communication cables on electrical poles.
  • Ecosystem and aesthetics of the area should be taken into consideration wherever possible while laying cables.
  • The rules will be applicable even for laying underground cables. The dug roads should be restored to original condition by the party.
  • The competent authority could revoke the license if the licensee is not executing the work in the scheduled time.
  • License to lay overhead cables will be restricted. Overhead cables are permitted only in exceptional cases, as otherwise it tends to interfere with the overhead electricity distribution systems apart from spoiling the beauty of the city.
  • The sag of the cable should not interfere with the movement of vehicles.
  • The applicant should earmark a pre-defined route alignment along the internal road circulation network, so as to avoid the repeated digging.
  • The license is granted for a specific period, maximum for five years.
  • Processing fee, Right of use or Right of way charges and annual rent is levied on the cable operator.
  • Penalty will be levied on those who lay or install cables without license and contravenes any provisions of these rules. The fine can be upto Rs 1,000 for violating the rules and Rs 300 for every day in case of continuing contravention.
  • Sharing of cable networks is not allowed if there is no license to do so.

It will be interesting to see how the cable policy in its final form will be, given the money and burden involved in laying cables, and how the industry will react to it.

Posted below is the draft policy.



Cable-Policy-Draft (Text)

Related Articles

Unauthorised OFC Cables disconnected
BBMP removes more unauthorised OFC cables
Cables and slabs dug up during asphalting

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Similar Story

Citizens step up: How South Bengaluru volunteers solved SIR hurdles

From tracking down 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked BLOs, community members in Bengaluru are stepping in where the system falls short.

While the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process aims to clean up electoral rolls, the enumeration forms created innumerable hurdles for existing voters. From tracking down elusive 2002 voter details to coordinating with overworked Booth Level Officers (BLOs), citizens across Bengaluru faced a daunting task completing the registration process. Recognising these challenges in their own neighbourhoods, volunteers led by three active citizens—Poongothai, Aparna Shamanth, and Venkatachalam Subramaniam—took it upon themselves to help people in their community and beyond.   Mapping the confusion in Gottigere Poongothai lives in Gottigere, which falls under the Bengaluru South assembly constituency. Her community consists of around 400…

Similar Story

Bidadi GBIT project: Land acquisition process and compensation raises critical questions

As the goverment focuses on land acquisition for the 7,481-acre project, are farmers' rights and crucial social impact checks being compromised?

The Greater Bengaluru Integrated Township (GBIT) in Bidadi, first notified in March 2025, received its final notification in June 2026 under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act (KUDA Act), 1987. The project is branded as India's first and largest AI City, featuring an AI-integrated township. The project will be implemented by the Greater Bengaluru Development Authority (GBDA) under the same act. Three villages, Kempainapalya, Vaderahalli, and Mandalahalli are notified in the Gazette under Section 19(1) of the KUDA Act for the implementation of a development scheme, deemed as public purpose. The development scheme is spread over a total of 7,481…