Finally, govt frames rules to address those dangerously dangling cables

Streets of Bengaluru are decorated with the black cables that Cable TV operators, hang from trees, balconies and street light poles - crisscrossing everywhere, causing risk to walkers and vehicles. What is the government doing to solve the problem?

Mahesh (name changed), a resident of Malleshwaram in Bengaluru, has been watching many cables hanging on a tree near his house, some of them looking as if they are cut. Fed up of seeing them everyday without being able to understand why they exist, Mahesh decided to check the cut cable. To his surprise, the cable was cut at the other end too, and came off easily when he pulled it.

People do not want to touch the hanging cables, because they think it could be electric cable and hence dangerous. As nobody checks them, unused cables laid by cable operators or telephone companies dangle on the trees and poles, without being disturbed for years.

Why are cables hanging from every tree or pole in Bengaluru, often causing nuisance? Why do cable operators hang them haphazardly and why did BBMP do nothing about it?

Cables of different varieties can be seen dangling across Bengaluru. Pic: Shree D N

Well, it is because the BBMP so far did not even have a policy that would regulate the laying of cables, except for laying Optical Fibre Cables (OFCs). There was none to tame the cable operators and majority of them would lay/hang the cables without obtaining license from BBMP.

As a result same roads were dug again and again, and telecom, cable and internet operators utilised same lines illegally without paying the prescribed fee to BBMP, which resulted in the loss of potential revenue.

In 2013, BBMP had formed a 10-member committee to inspect and estimate the number of illegal cables in the city and ascertain the revenue loss to Palike’s exchequer. According to a The New Indian Express report, the Committee had estimated that 90 per cent of the cables in Bengaluru were illegal. After inspecting various locations, the then Committee Chairman N R Ramesh had said that about 60,000 km stretch was dug up in Bengaluru to lay OFCs, of which at least 55,000 km were illegal. An additional 8,000 km length illegal overhead cables should be removed, he had stated.

Finally a draft for cables

Now the Urban Development Department has issued a draft policy to regulate optic fibres and all other cables in public places. The draft policy – the Karnataka Municipal Corporations (Regulation of cable laying) Rules, 2015 was published on January 14th, 2016. The month’s time for public and stakeholders to submit objections and suggestions is now over.

Here are the highlights of the proposed policy:

  • It is mandatory to obtain licenses for laying / mandating cables within the areas of corporation.
  • Fixed time frame for the completion of infrastructure work.
  • No inconvenience can be caused to the public in the process of carrying out the operations.
  • Proposed route, number of poles, dimension of the poles, distance between two poles and the minimum ground clearance required for the cable will need to be spelt out in the proposals.
  • There can be no communication cables on electrical poles.
  • Ecosystem and aesthetics of the area should be taken into consideration wherever possible while laying cables.
  • The rules will be applicable even for laying underground cables. The dug roads should be restored to original condition by the party.
  • The competent authority could revoke the license if the licensee is not executing the work in the scheduled time.
  • License to lay overhead cables will be restricted. Overhead cables are permitted only in exceptional cases, as otherwise it tends to interfere with the overhead electricity distribution systems apart from spoiling the beauty of the city.
  • The sag of the cable should not interfere with the movement of vehicles.
  • The applicant should earmark a pre-defined route alignment along the internal road circulation network, so as to avoid the repeated digging.
  • The license is granted for a specific period, maximum for five years.
  • Processing fee, Right of use or Right of way charges and annual rent is levied on the cable operator.
  • Penalty will be levied on those who lay or install cables without license and contravenes any provisions of these rules. The fine can be upto Rs 1,000 for violating the rules and Rs 300 for every day in case of continuing contravention.
  • Sharing of cable networks is not allowed if there is no license to do so.

It will be interesting to see how the cable policy in its final form will be, given the money and burden involved in laying cables, and how the industry will react to it.

Posted below is the draft policy.



Cable-Policy-Draft (Text)

Related Articles

Unauthorised OFC Cables disconnected
BBMP removes more unauthorised OFC cables
Cables and slabs dug up during asphalting

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Similar Story

Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill: Where is Brand Bengaluru vision? And the people’s voice?

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024, tabled at the Karnataka Assembly, has largely bypassed the people. Know more about the draft law.

The Greater Bengaluru Governance Bill, 2024 (GBG) was tabled at the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on July 23rd. It outlines a three-tier structure to govern Bengaluru: A new body called the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) for coordinating and supervising the development of the Greater Bengaluru Area; ward committees as basic units of urban governance and to facilitate community participation; and ten City Corporations in the Greater Bengaluru Area for effective, participatory and responsive governance.  However, the Bill has been criticised by several groups and urban practitioners for being in contravention of the 74th Constitutional Amendment, which decentralises power to lower levels…

Similar Story

Open letter to Deputy CM: Reconsider BBMP’s proposed restructuring

The letter highlights the key concern of the imminent disempowering of BBMP councillors and Bengaluru coming under state control.

Dear Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar, We write to you to express some concerns that Citizens' Action Forum (CAF) and a significant section of the citizenry have regarding the proposed restructuring of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP). At the outset, we do believe that there are positives in the concept. However, there are concerns with the process, a few assumptions made, and the lack of details regarding the implementation of such a major decision. Read more: Will restructuring into 10 zones help BBMP? Our concerns are listed as follows: There is an assumption that the principal problem plaguing BBMP’s…